• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
6 results

Jofebar, S.A. v. Orama Minimal Frames Estairia Periorismenis Efthynis

Docket 91294376, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Oct. 1, 2024)
Case TypeOpposition
MarksPANORAMAH!, ORAMA MINIMAL FRAMES
DeadlineCONFERENCE, DISCOVERY, DISCLOSURE AND TRIAL SCHEDULE Time to Answer Deadline for Discovery Conference Discovery Opens Initial Disclosures Due Expert Disclosures Due Discovery Closes Plaintiff's Pretrial Disclosures Due Plaintiff's 30-day Trial Period Ends Defendant's Pretrial Disclosures Due Defendant's 30-day Trial Period Ends Plaintiff's Rebuttal Disclosures Due Plaintiff's 15-day Rebuttal Period Ends Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due Defendant's Brief Due Plaintiff's Reply Brief Due Request for Oral Hearing (optional) Due 11/16/2024 12/16/2024 12/16/2024 1/15/2025 5/15/2025 6/14/2025 7/29/2025 9/12/2025 9/27/2025 11/11/2025 11/26/2025 12/26/2025 2/24/2026 3/26/2026 4/10/2026 4/20/2026
Applicant Orama Minimal Frames Estairia Periorismenis Efthynis
Opposer Jofebar, S.A.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 2 - Notice and Trial Dates Sent; Answer Due:

Document Jofebar, S.A. v. Orama Minimal Frames Estairia Periorismenis Efthynis, 91294376, No. 2 (T.T.A.B. Oct. 7, 2024)
An answer filed on paper under these limited circumstances must be accompanied by a Petition to the Director (and the required fee under Trademark Rule 2.6).
participation must be made either through ESTTA, or by telephone call to the assigned interlocutory attorney named on the TTABVUE record for this proceeding.
During their conference, the parties are to discuss whether they wish to seek mediation or arbitration, and whether they can stipulate to the Board's Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) process for a more efficient and cost -effective means of obtaining the Board’s determination of the proceeding.
Regarding the procedures and deadlines for pretrial disclosures and trial, and specifically the noticing, taking, serving and submitting of evidence and testimony, see Trademark Rules 2.120(k), 2.121, 2.122, 2.123 and 2.125, as well as TBMP Chapter 700.
Effective August 3, 2019, the USPTO amended its rules to require applicants, registrants or parties to a proceeding whose domicile is not located within the U.S. or its territories to be represented by an attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a state in the U.S., including the District of Columbia or any Commonwealth or territory.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 5

Document Jofebar, S.A. v. Orama Minimal Frames Estairia Periorismenis Efthynis, 91294376, No. 5 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 14, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 4

Document Jofebar, S.A. v. Orama Minimal Frames Estairia Periorismenis Efthynis, 91294376, No. 4 (T.T.A.B. Nov. 7, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1

Document Jofebar, S.A. v. Orama Minimal Frames Estairia Periorismenis Efthynis, 91294376, No. 1 (T.T.A.B. Oct. 1, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 6

Document Jofebar, S.A. v. Orama Minimal Frames Estairia Periorismenis Efthynis, 91294376, No. 6 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 14, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search