• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
13 results

Moosehead Breweries Limited v. Siam Winery Company Limited

Docket 91277931, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Aug. 12, 2022)
Case TypeOpposition
MarksMOOSE, MOOSE BREW, MOOSEHEAD, MOOSE QUALITY & TRADITION, MOOSE LIGHT, MOOSEHEAD RADLER, MOOSE CRAFT CIDER EST 2014
Applicant Siam Winery Company Limited
Opposer Moosehead Breweries Limited
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 13 - Board Decision: Opposition Sustained

Document Moosehead Breweries Limited v. Siam Winery Company Limited, 91277931, No. 13 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 28, 2023)
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O.
Siam Winery Company Limited
By the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board: On March 27, 2023, Applicant filed an abandonment of its application Serial No. 88605456 with prejudice.
Trademark Rule 2.135 provides that if, in an inter partes proceeding, the Applicant files an abandonment without the written consent of every adverse part y to the proceeding, judgment shall be entered against Applicant.
In view thereof, and because Opposer's written consent to the abandonment is not of record, judgment is hereby entered against Applicant, the opposition is sustained and registration to Applicant is refused.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 11 - Extension of Time Granted

Document Moosehead Breweries Limited v. Siam Winery Company Limited, 91277931, No. 11 (T.T.A.B. Feb. 15, 2023)
Generally, the Federal Rules of Evidence apply to Board trials.
The parties may stipulate to a wide variety of matters, and many requirements relevant to the trial phase of Board proceedings are set forth in Trademark Rules 2.121 through 2.125.
Oral argument at final hearing will be scheduled only upon the timely submission of a separate notice as allowed by Trademark Rule 2.129(a).
Note: Parties are strongly encouraged to check the entire document before filing.1 The Board will not extend or reset proceeding schedule dates or other deadlines to allow time to re-file documents.
1 To facilitate accuracy, ESTTA provides thumbnails to view each page before submitting.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 5 - Extension of Time Granted

Document MOOSEHEAD BREWERIES LIMITED v. Siam Winery Company Limited, 91277931, No. 5 (T.T.A.B. Sep. 16, 2022)
Generally, the Federal Rules of Evidence apply to Board trials.
The parties may stipulate to a wide variety of matters, and many requirements relevant to the trial phase of Board proceedings are set forth in Trademark Rules 2.121 through 2.125.
Oral argument at final hearing will be scheduled only upon the timely submission of a separate notice as allowed by Trademark Rule 2.129(a).
Note: Parties are strongly encouraged to check the entire document before filing.1 The Board will not extend or reset proceeding schedule dates or other deadlines to allow time to re-file documents.
1 To facilitate accuracy, ESTTA provides thumbnails to view each page before submitting.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 2 - Notice and Trial Dates Sent; Answer Due:

Document MOOSEHEAD BREWERIES LIMITED v. Siam Winery Company Limited, 91277931, No. 2 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 12, 2022)
An answer filed on paper under these limited circumstances must be accompanied by a Petition to the Director (and the required fee under Trademark Rule 2.6).
A request for Board participation must be made either through ESTTA, or by telephone call to the assigned interlocutory attorney named on the TTABVUE record for this proceeding.
During their conference, the parties are to discuss whether they wish to seek mediation or arbitration, and whether they can stipulate to the Board's Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) process for a more efficient and cost-effective means of obtaining the Board’s determination of the proceeding.
Regarding the scope and limits of discovery, see TBMP 414; discoverable items may include documents, tangible things, and electronically stored information (ESI).
Regarding the procedures and deadlines for pretrial disclosures and trial, and specifically the noticing, taking, serving and submitting of evidence and testimony, see Trademark Rules 2.120(k), 2.121, 2.122, 2.123 and 2.125, as well as TBMP Chapter 700.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 10

Document Moosehead Breweries Limited v. Siam Winery Company Limited, 91277931, No. 10 (T.T.A.B. Feb. 15, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 8

Document Moosehead Breweries Limited v. Siam Winery Company Limited, 91277931, No. 8 (T.T.A.B. Nov. 28, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 6

Document MOOSEHEAD BREWERIES LIMITED v. Siam Winery Company Limited, 91277931, No. 6 (T.T.A.B. Oct. 21, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 >>