Defendant submissions include construction man ger, Shreyans Jain; engine structural r, of Elevated Engineering History" DOB's "Complaint disposition Rescinded" on October 30, 2024. on November 1, 7, and 13, The Court h ld a hearing on this application, 2024; and heard t e sworn testimony from four witnesses project (1) Karl Tipler, SPAR; 02) AdamLevine, director with Plai Architects project associate with s SPAR; (3) Gustavo J. Jorge, Plaintiff's in, Defendant's construction mariager.
is well-es It ablished temporary restrai makethe requisit to halt construction ing order clear showing of a likelihood that, on a "motion for a preliminary and injunction [, movant must] of the building of success on the merits ... .
must demo strate of success on the merits, danger of a probab.ility and a balance of equities in the absence.of an injunction irreparable njury favor" in its (Nobu Next Door, LC v Fine Arts Hous., Defendant aintains that Plaintiff The issue tc be determined inc,, 4 NY3d 839, 840 [2005]).
to meet its aforesaid has failed is solely whether Plaintiff should be during the pender(cy of the action; relief, from perfòrming should be enjoined; with the Project ) "without required protections installed', th.e legally ( from entering BERDO'spròperty without "in an unsafe rnan ier permission; ; (3) ermg with BERDO'sremoval of Defendants pipe framing that and (4) on BERDO'ssidewalk shed.
The parties re.encouraged, together with thei respective effort to resolve t is matter; and/or schedule for the to meet and confer, and directed, forthwith, to make a good faith and engineers, architects to an expedited to stipulate completion of all iscovery.