• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
6 results

Sana Ismail Abudawood et al v. Eleanor de Leon et al

Docket 8:23-cv-02448, California Central District Court (Dec. 22, 2023)
Judge Josephine L. Staton, presiding, Magistrate Judge John D. Early
Contract - Other
02/07/2024
... to enforce the award. IT IS SO ORDERED. Attorney for Plaintiff(s): Mark Holscher, Edward Hillenbrand. Attorney for Defendant(s): None Present. Courtroom Deputy: Gabriela Garcia. Time in C...
01/26/2024
... IT IS SO ORDERED. Attorney for Petitioner: Mark Holscher; Edward Hillenbrand, Michael Shipley. Attorney for Respondent: None Present. Courtroom Deputy: Gabriela Garcia. Time in ...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Jasper O. Crook v. San Bernardino County Sheriff Department et al

Docket 5:23-cv-02448, California Central District Court (Dec. 1, 2023)
Judge James V. Selna, presiding, Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar
Civil Rights - Other
DivisionRiverside (Eastern Division)
Flags194, RELATED-DDJ
Cause42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Case Type440 Civil Rights - Other
Tags440 Civil Rights, Other, 440 Civil Rights, Other
Plaintiff Jasper O. Crook
Defendant San Bernardino County Sheriff Department
Defendant Victorville Police Department
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Theresa Brooke v. Marriott Hotel Services LLC

Docket 2:23-cv-02448, California Central District Court (Apr. 2, 2023)
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, presiding
Civil Rights - Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
DivisionLos Angeles (Western Division)
FlagsACCO, MJDAP
Demand$4,000
Cause42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Case Type446 Civil Rights - Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Tags446 Civil Rights, Americans With Disabilities Act, Other, 446 Civil Rights, Americans With Disabilities Act, Other
Plaintiff Theresa Brooke
Defendant Marriott Hotel Services LLC
Defendant Blue Devils Lessee LLC
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 66 ANTI-SUIT PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the ...

Document Sana Ismail Abudawood et al v. Eleanor de Leon et al, 8:23-cv-02448, No. 66 (C.D.Cal. Apr. 10, 2024)
) Despite numerous opportunities to comply with the Award, the De Leons nonetheless failed to do so.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 44 AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton

Document Sana Ismail Abudawood et al v. Eleanor de Leon et al, 8:23-cv-02448, No. 44 (C.D.Cal. Mar. 18, 2024)
Motion for Judgment
On December 22, 2023, Applicants and Movants Sheikha Sana Ismail Abudawood, Sheikh Anas Ismail Abudawood, Sheikh Ayman Ismail Abudawood, and Sheikha Salwa Ismail Abudawood’s (collectively, “Applicants”), through their counsel, Mark Holscher, Michael Shipley, and Edward Hillenbrand of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, moved to Confirm an Arbitral Award dated October 13, 2023, pursuant 9 U.S.C. § 9.
Respondents Eleanor de Leon and Alaa Abudawood (“Respondents”), did not appear or oppose.
Applying the procedure “in the manner provided by law for the making and hearing of motions,” 9 U.S.C. § 6, the Court granted the motion.
By reason of said ruling, Applicants are entitled to have judgment of the Court entered upon the award.
The Arbitrator’s October 13, 2023 Award is CONFIRMED.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 28 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton

Document Abudawood et al v. de Leon et al, 8:23-cv-02448, No. 28 (C.D.Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)
Motion for Judgment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 On December 22, 2023, Applicants and Movants Sheikha Sana Ismail Abudawood, Sheikh Anas Ismail Abudawood, Sheikh Ayman Ismail Abudawood, and Sheikha Salwa Ismail Abudawood’s (collectively, “Applicants”), through their counsel, Mark Holscher, Michael Shipley, and Edward Hillenbrand of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, moved to Confirm an Arbitral Award dated October 13, 2023, pursuant 9 U.S.C. § 9.
Respondents Eleanor de Leon and Aala Abudawood (“Respondents”), did not appear or oppose.
Applying the procedure “in the manner provided by law for the making and hearing of motions,” 9 U.S.C. § 6, the Court granted the motion.
By reason of said ruling, Applicants are entitled to have judgment of the Court entered upon the award.
Applicants shall recover from Respondents post-Award attorneys’ fees and costs in an amount to be determined.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search