• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
4 results

Alexey Novitskiy v. David M. Radel et al

Docket 8:23-cv-01368, California Central District Court (July 31, 2023)
Judge Fred W. Slaughter, presiding, Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick
Immigration - Other
07/31/2023
07/31/2023 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Alexey Novitskiy, identifying none. (David, Kristina) (Entered: 07/31/2023)
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Matt Gaetz et al v. City of Riverside et al

Docket 5:23-cv-01368, California Central District Court (July 13, 2023)
Judge Hernan D. Vera, presiding, Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani
Civil Rights - Other
DivisionRiverside (Eastern Division)
FlagsACCO, (SHKx), DISCOVERY, MANADR
Cause42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Case Type440 Civil Rights - Other
Tags440 Civil Rights, Other, 440 Civil Rights, Other
Plaintiff Representative Matt Gaetz
Plaintiff Representative Marjorie Taylor-Greene
Plaintiff Put America First Joint Fundraising Committee
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Chunmei Dai v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al

Docket 2:23-cv-01368, California Central District Court (Feb. 21, 2023)
Judge Fernando M. Olguin, presiding, Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth
Immigration - Other
DivisionLos Angeles (Western Division)
Flags(JPRx), DISCOVERY
Cause08:1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Case Type465 Immigration - Other
Tags465 Immigration, Other, 465 Immigration, Other
Plaintiff Chunmei Dai
Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas
Defendant Merrick Garland
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35669614 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Marjorie Taylor Greene, ...

Document Matt Gaetz et al v. City of Riverside et al, 5:23-cv-01368, No. 1 (C.D.Cal. Jul. 13, 2023)
Complaint
RAINCROSS continued in this position even after being provided federal election filings and a legal opinion confirming coverage and even after the public information officer of RIVERSIDE had acknowledged that there was nothing in the contract that would allow for cancellation of the event.
RAINCROSS and RIVERSIDE acted with malice, oppression, and wanton and intentional disregard of the rights of Plaintiffs when it cancelled the event contract based on the political viewpoints of the scheduled speakers.
ANAHEIM and its officials acted with malice, oppression, and wanton and intentional disregard of the rights of Plaintiffs when it coerced The Grand Theater to cancel the event contract based on the political viewpoints of the scheduled speakers.
The overt acts taken by Defendants in furtherance of the conspiracy caused injury to Plaintiffs, including the deprivation of First Amendment rights, the loss of financial and political support from individuals who planned to attend the rallies, and emotional distress.
For punitive damages against Defendants, and each of them, for acting with malice, oppression, and wanton disregard for the law in engaging in political viewpoint discrimination and conspiracy to deprive Plaintiffs of their civil rights.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search