• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
18 results

Harbor Pipe and Steel Inc v. Mazak Optonics Corporation

Docket 5:22-cv-01775, California Central District Court (Oct. 7, 2022)
Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, presiding, Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym
Fraud
DivisionRiverside (Eastern Division)
FlagsACCO, (SPx), DISCOVERY, MANADR
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Case Type370 Fraud
Tags370 Fraud, 370 Fraud
Harbor Pipe & Steel Inc
Plaintiff Harbor Pipe and Steel Inc
Defendant Mazak Optonics Corporation
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Los Alamitos Medical Center, Inc. et al v. Local Initiative Health Authority for Los An...

Docket 8:22-cv-01775, California Central District Court (Sept. 28, 2022)
Judge John W. Holcomb, presiding, Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth
Contract - Other
DivisionSanta Ana (Southern Division)
FlagsACCO, (ADSx), CLOSED, DISCOVERY, MANADR, RELATED-G, REMANDED
Cause28:1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Case Type190 Contract - Other
Tags190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other, 190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other
Petitioner Los Alamitos Medical Center, Inc.
Petitioner Placentia Linda Hospital, Inc.
Petitioner Lakewood Regional Medical Center, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Ernest Simon, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles et al

Docket 2:22-cv-01775, California Central District Court (Mar. 17, 2022)
Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, presiding, Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish
Civil Rights - Other
DivisionLos Angeles (Western Division)
FlagsACCO, (GJSx), DISCOVERY, MANADR, PROTORD
Demand$9,999,000
Cause42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Case Type440 Civil Rights - Other
Tags440 Civil Rights, Other, 440 Civil Rights, Other
Plaintiff Ernest Simon, Jr.
Defendant City of Los Angeles
Defendant Michel Moore
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 41 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Production of Documents filed by Ernest Simon, Jr

Document Ernest Simon, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles et al, 2:22-cv-01775, No. 41 (C.D.Cal. Mar. 30, 2023)
Motion to Compel Production Document
... Production Of The Requested Documents ........... 3 The City’s Boilerplate Objections Rely on California Privilege Law, Which Does Not Apply To A Federal Civil Rights Action ........... 5 Even Under Applicable Federal Privilege Law, None ...
Third, and most fatal to the City’s position, none of its asserted privileges apply to any of the documents requested.
C. Even Under Applicable Federal Privilege Law, None Of The Documents Requested Are Privileged Although the City has cited only inapplicable state privilege law, Plaintiff addresses the corollary federal privilege law to demonstrate ...
Moreover, none of the privileges mentioned in the City’s boilerplate objection apply here.
) None of these objections have merit.
Because none of these three conditions apply here, this Court must award Plaintiff his attorney’s fees if it grants his motion to compel.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

No. 1

Document Harbor Pipe & Steel Inc et al, 5:22-cv-01775, No. 1 (C.D.Cal. Oct. 7, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 51

Document Ernest Simon, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles et al, 2:22-cv-01775, No. 51 (C.D.Cal. Jun. 1, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 10

Document Ernest Simon, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles et al, 2:22-cv-01775, No. 10 (C.D.Cal. Apr. 15, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1

Document Ernest Simon, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles et al, 2:22-cv-01775, No. 1 (C.D.Cal. Mar. 17, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 >>