• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
8 results

In re COMPAÑIA DE VINOS SANTIAGO JORDI, S.L.

Docket 79303732, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Jan. 21, 2022)
Case TypeExparte Appeal
TagsExparte Appeal, Appeal
MarksWILD HEART
Applicant COMPAÑIA DE VINOS SANTIAGO JORDI, S.L.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 8 - Board Decision: Dismissed for Failure to File Brief

Document In re COMPAÑIA DE VINOS SANTIAGO JORDI, S.L., 79303732, No. 8 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 8, 2022)
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O.
By the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board: Ex Parte Appeal No. 79303732
Appellant did not file a brief within the time set in the Board’s order of May 24, 2022.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 7 - ADD’L Request TO EXT TIME TO FILE MAIN BRIEF GRANTED

Document In re COMPAÑIA DE VINOS SANTIAGO JORDI, S.L., 79303732, No. 7 (T.T.A.B. May. 24, 2022)
In its request, Appellant argues that there is good cause for an extension because it is trying to negotiate a consent agreement.
Section 1203.02(d) of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure (“TBMP”) provides the following explanation about good cause and requests for extensions of time: The determination of good cause will be based upon all relevant circumstances, including the length of time of any previously granted extensions and the reason(s) for the requested extension(s).
Thus, a reason such as the press of other business, which may be sufficient to show good cause for a first extension of thirty days, may not be sufficient for a second extension of time.
Depending on the totality of the circumstances, good cause has been found when there has been an appointment of a new attorney, illness, the need to get instructions from a foreign applicant, and attempting to negotiate a consent agreement.
Insofar as Appellant has demonstrated good cause based on the totality of the circumstances, Appellant’s request is approved and Appellant is al lowed until July 20, 2022 to file its appeal brief.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 5 - Extension Granted

Document In re COMPAÑIA DE VINOS SANTIAGO JORDI, S.L., 79303732, No. 5 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 29, 2022)
In its request, Appellant argues that there is good cause for an extension because it is trying to negotiate a consent agreement.
Section 1203.02(d) of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure (“TBMP”) provides the following explanation about good cause and requests for extensions of time: The determination of good cause will be based upon all relevant circumstances, including the length of time of any previously granted extensions and the reason(s) for the requested extension(s).
Thus, a reason such as the press of other business, which may be sufficient to show good cause for a first extension of thirty days, may not be sufficient for a second extension of time.
Depending on the totality of the circumstances, good cause has been found when there has been an appointment of a new attorney, illness, the need to get instructions from a foreign applicant, and attempting to negotiate a consent agreement.
1 Pursuant to Trademark Rule 2.6(a)(18)(iii), 37 C.F.R. § 2.6(a)(18)(iii), no fee is required for filing a first request for an extension of time to file an appeal brief.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 6 - ADD’L Request TO EXT TIME TO FILE MAIN BRIEF

Document In re COMPAÑIA DE VINOS SANTIAGO JORDI, S.L., 79303732, No. 6 (T.T.A.B. May. 23, 2022)
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System.
WILD HEART & Design The Examiner issued a FINAL refusal to register the subject mark to which Applicant filed a Notice of Appeal.
Applicant respectfully requests a further sixty (60) day extension of time to file its Brief up to and including July 20, 2022.
Applicant is in active communication with the owner of the cited registration in an attempt to resolve the Examiner’s objection via a Consent Agreement.
This Request is not being filed for purposes of delay, but rather to protect Applicant’s rights in connection with the application.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 4

Document In re COMPAÑIA DE VINOS SANTIAGO JORDI, S.L., 79303732, No. 4 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 22, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1

Document In re COMPAÑIA DE VINOS SANTIAGO JORDI, S.L., 79303732, No. 1 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 21, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 2

Document In re COMPAÑIA DE VINOS SANTIAGO JORDI, S.L., 79303732, No. 2 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 21, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search