• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
34 results

USA v. Chinnery et al

Docket 7:21-cr-00463, New York Southern District Court (July 20, 2021)
Judge Cathy Seibel, presiding
DivisionWhite Plains
FlagsAPPEAL, ECF
Defendant Pedro Chinnery
Defendant Jermaine Lightfoot
Defendant Stan Jones
...

No. 205 CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE AS TO SPECIFIC PROPERTY as to Stan Jones

Document USA v. Chinnery et al, 7:21-cr-00463, No. 205 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2024)
463 (CS)(the “Indictment”), with narcotics conspiracy, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 846 (Count Two); WHEREAS,the Indictment includeda forfeiture allegation as to Count Two of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, of any andall property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained,directly or indirectly, as a result of the offense charged in Count Twoofthe Indictment, and anyand all property used, or intended to be used, in any mannerorpart, to commit, or to facilitate the commission ofthe offense charged in Count Two ofthe Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission ofsaid offense; WHEREAS,onor about June 21, 2021, the Government seized from 360 Huguenot Street, New Rochelle, New York, and the defendant’s person and a Gray Honda Oddysey, both nearthat location, $572,922 in United States currency (the “Specific Property”); WHEREAS, on or about September 20, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Count Two of the Indictment, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant Filed 12/17/24 Page2of5 to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, all ofhis right, title and interest in the Specific Property; WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the forfeiture of all his right, title and interest in the Specific Property, which constitute proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count Two of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(g), and Rules 32.2(b)(3), and 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Government is now entitled, pending any assertion of énparty claims, to reduce the Specific Property to its possession and to notify any and all persons who reasonably appear to be a potential claimant of their interest herein; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED,by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorneys Jeffrey C. Coffman, of counsel, and the Defendant, and his counsel, Richard Levitt, Esq., that: , As aresult of the offense charged in Count Twoofthe Indictment, to which the Defendantpled guilty, all of the Defendant’s right, title and interest in the Specific Property is hereby forfeited to the United States for disposition in accordance with the law, subject to the provisions of Title 21, United States Code, Section 853.
The published notice of forfeiture shall state that the petition (i) shall be for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the petitioner’s alleged interest in the Specific Property,(ii) shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury, and (iii) shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner’s right, title or interest in the Specific Property, the time and circumstances of the petitioner’s acquisition ofthe right, title and interest in the Specific Property, any additional facts supporting the petitioner’s claim, and the relief sought, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n).
Pursuant to 32.2 (b)(6)(A) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Government shall send notice to any person who reasonably appears to be a potential claimant with standing to contest the forfeiture in the ancillary proceeding.
Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney’s Office is authorized to conduct any discovery neededto identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.
The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original butall of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.
cite Cite Document

No. 204 JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE as to Stan Jones (3)

Document USA v. Chinnery et al, 7:21-cr-00463, No. 204 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2024)
Motion for Judgment
If ordered to payrestitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of material changes in economic circumstances, 12/13/2024 Date of Imposition of Judgment Signature ofJudge athy Seibel, U.S.D.J.
1 The above drug testing condition is suspended, based onthe court's determination that you pose a low risk of future substance abuse.
as directed by the probation officer, the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agency in the location where you reside, work, are a student, or were convicted of a qualifying offense.
You mustnot knowingly leave the federal judicial district where you are authorized to reside withoutfirst getting permission from the court or the probation officer.
You must not own,possess, or have accessto a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or dangerous weapon(i.e., anything that was designed, or was modified for, the specific purpose of causing bodily injury or death to anotherperson such as nunchakusortasers).
cite Cite Document

No. 192 PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT as to Jermaine Lightfoot

Document USA v. Chinnery et al, 7:21-cr-00463, No. 192 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2024)
463 (CS) (the “Indictment”), with conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846 (Count One); and conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846 (Count Two); WHEREAS, the Indictment included forfeiture allegations as to Counts One and Two of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, of any and all property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment, and any and all property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, on or about October 3, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Count Two of the Indictment, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count Two of the Indictment and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, a sum of money equal to $1,470,000 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count Two of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, the Government seeks the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $1,470,000 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count Two of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained; WHEREAS, the Court finds that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count Two of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
All payments on the outstanding Money Judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew’s Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant’s name and case number.
Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney’s Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.
cite Cite Document

No. 185

Document USA v. Chinnery et al, 7:21-cr-00463, No. 185 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 184

Document USA v. Chinnery et al, 7:21-cr-00463, No. 184 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 178

Document USA v. Chinnery et al, 7:21-cr-00463, No. 178 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2023)

cite Cite Document

No. 175

Document USA v. Chinnery et al, 7:21-cr-00463, No. 175 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2023)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 >>