• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
8 results

Callier v. Unified Health, LLC

Docket 3:23-cv-00375, Texas Western District Court (Oct. 11, 2023)
Judge Kathleen Cardone, presiding
DivisionEl Paso
Demand$42,000
Cause47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff Callier
Defendant Unified Health, LLC
Plaintiff Brandon L Callier
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

ParkerVision, Inc. v. MediaTek Inc. et al

Docket 6:23-cv-00375, Texas Western District Court (May 16, 2023)
Judge Alan D Albright, presiding
Patent
DivisionWaco
FlagsPATENT
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Deadline7/25/2025 Close of Fact Discovery
Deadline7/25/2025 Close of Fact Discovery 8/12/2025 Opening Expert Reports 9/12/2025 Rebuttal Expert Reports 9/26/2025 Close of Expert Discovery 9/30/2025 Deadline for the second of two meet and confer to discuss narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior art references prior art combinations at issue to triable limits.
Plaintiff ParkerVision, Inc.
Defendant MediaTek Inc.
Defendant MediaTek USA Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Sima v. Credit Corp Solutions, Inc. et al

Docket 1:23-cv-00375, Texas Western District Court (Apr. 3, 2023)
Judge Robert Pitman, presiding
Consumer Credit
DivisionAustin
FlagsCLOSED
Cause15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Case Type480 Consumer Credit
Tags480 Consumer Credit, 480 Consumer Credit
Plaintiff Samba Sima
Defendant Credit Corp Solutions, Inc.
Defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Cantu v. Olveda

Docket 5:23-cv-00375, Texas Western District Court (Mar. 27, 2023)
Judge Fred Biery, presiding
Prisoner - Civil Rights
DivisionSan Antonio
FlagsCLOSED, M.De Salme
Demand$800,000
Cause42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case Type550 Prisoner - Civil Rights
Tags550 Prisoner, Civil Rights, 550 Prisoner, Civil Rights
Plaintiff Cantu
Defendant Olveda
Plaintiff Robert Charles Cantu
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 50 ORDER GRANTING 49 Motion to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines

Document ParkerVision, Inc. v. MediaTek Inc. et al, 6:23-cv-00375, No. 50 (W.D.Tex. Jul. 15, 2024)
This deadline does not relieve the Parties of their obligation to seasonably amend if new information is identified after initial contentions.
Unless the parties agree to the narrowing, they are ordered to contact the Court’s Law Clerk to arrange a teleconference with the Court to resolve the disputed issues.
The parties shall file a Joint Report within 5 business days regarding the results of the meet and confer.
12/15/2025 Parties to jointly email the Court’s law clerk (See OGP at 1) to confirm their pretrial conference and trial dates.
1/30/2026 File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial disclosures and disputes on motions in limine.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 49 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines by ParkerVision, Inc

Document ParkerVision, Inc. v. MediaTek Inc. et al, 6:23-cv-00375, No. 49 (W.D.Tex. Jul. 15, 2024)
Plaintiff, ParkerVision, Inc. files this unopposed Motion to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines and respectfully requests the Court to enter the Parties’ Agreed Amended Scheduling Order attached to this motion.
Dated: July 12, 2024
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 6 Summons Issued as to MediaTek Inc., MediaTek USA Inc

Document ParkerVision, Inc. v. MediaTek Inc. et al, 6:23-cv-00375, No. 6 (W.D.Tex. May. 18, 2023)
This summonsfor (nameofindividual andtitle, ifany) wasreceived by me on(date) C1 I personally served the summonsonthe individualat (piace)
on (date) 3 or C1 I left the summonsat the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion whoresidesthere, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or C1 I served the summonson (nameofindividual) , whois designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name oforganization)
Server's address Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
This summonsfor (nameofindividual andtitle, ifany) wasreceived by me on(date) C1 I personally served the summonsonthe individualat (piace)
on (date) 3 or C1 I left the summonsat the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion whoresidesthere, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or C1 I served the summonson (nameofindividual) , whois designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name oforganization)
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 3

Document ParkerVision, Inc. v. MediaTek Inc. et al, 6:23-cv-00375, No. 3 (W.D.Tex. May. 17, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search