• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
8 results

PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Panjiva, Inc.

Docket 5:18-cv-03580, California Northern District Court (June 14, 2018)
Judge Beth Labson Freeman, presiding
Patent
DivisionSan Jose
FlagsCLOSED
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent6928442; 7802310; 7945544; 8099420, 6928442, 7802310, 7945544, 8099420
Plaintiff PersonalWeb Technologies LLC
Plaintiff Level 3 Communications LLC
Defendant Panjiva, Inc.
cite Cite Docket

No. 60 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR AMENDED JUDGMENT

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Panjiva, Inc., 5:18-cv-03580, No. 60 (N.D.Cal. Jul. 20, 2021)
Motion for JudgmentDenied
The Court again DENIES the request by Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Twitch Interactive, Inc. for a new judgment.
As the Court explained in its previous order denying the request, ECF 699, Fed. R. Civ.
P. 58(d) does not provide for multiple judgments in a single case.
The Court has attached a proposed amended judgment to this Order.
The Court will file the amended judgment on July 26, 2021, absent objection from either party.
cite Cite Document

No. 59 **FILED IN ERROR, SEE 702 FOR CORRECTED ENTRY** ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR AMENDED JUDGMENT

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Panjiva, Inc., 5:18-cv-03580, No. 59 (N.D.Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)
Motion for JudgmentDenied
On March 13, 2019, the Court issued its order granting in part and denying in part Amazon’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that all infringement claims made against Amazon’s Simple Storage Service (“S3”) were barred by claim preclusion and the Kessler doctrine.
On February 3, 2020, the Court issued its order granting in part and denying in part Amazon.com, Inc.’s and Amazon Web Services, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement, and granting Twitch Interactive, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment of Northern District of California United States District Court noninfringement.
On March 2, 2021, the Court awarded Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Twitch Interactive, Inc. $4,615,242.28 in attorney fees and $203,300.10 in non-taxable costs.
On April 19, 2021, the Court granted an additional $571,961.71 in attorney fees and $11,120.97 in non-taxable costs in a separate order.
Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered in favor of, Amazon and against PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, in the amount of $5,403,122.68.
cite Cite Document

No. 55 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINTS OR ...

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Panjiva, Inc., 5:18-cv-03580, No. 55 (N.D.Cal. Aug. 17, 2018)
Motion to Extend TimeGranted
6-1(a), the undersigned parties to this multidistrict litigation (the “parties”) hereby stipulate and recite as follows: WHEREAS, on July 13, 2018, the Court issued an Order granting the parties’ joint stipula- tion continuing the Preliminary Case Management Conference (Dkt. No. 26, the “Continued CMC Order”); WHEREAS, as part of the Continued CMC Order, the Court permitted the parties to file a stipulation extending any defendant’s deadline to respond to the complaint up to a date that is two weeks after the Preliminary Case Management Conference without obtaining a court order (Id.); WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the Court issued an Order setting the Preliminary Case Man- agement Conference for September 20, 2018 (Dkt. No. 28, the “Reset CMC Order”); WHEREAS, two weeks after the September 20, 2018 Preliminary Case Management Con- ference is October 4, 2018; WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties that was then made part of the
Continued CMC Order (Dkt. No. 26) and the Reset CMC Order (Dkt. No. 28), all cases that are part of this multidistrict litigation are stayed until September 20, 2018; WHEREAS, the following defendants have requested, and PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC (collectively, “PersonalWeb”) have agreed to, an exten- sion of time up to and including October 4, 2018, for each of the following defendants to file an answer or otherwise respond to PersonalWeb’s Complaint or First Amended Complaint:  Square, Inc., Atlas Obscura, Inc., LiveChat, Inc., Airbnb, Inc., Goldbely, Inc., Leap Motion, Inc., Spokeo, Inc., Heroku, Inc., Merkle, Inc., Karma Mobility Inc., Match Group, LLC, Match Group, Inc., WeddingWire, Inc., Capterra, Inc., Atlassian, Inc., Cloud 66, Inc., Curebit, Inc., Doximity, Inc., GoPro, Inc., Melian Labs, Inc., Quo- tient Technology Inc., Reddit, Inc., Roblox Corporation, Stitch Fix, Inc., Tophatter, Inc., Webflow, Inc., Vend Inc., BDG Media, Inc., Bitly, Inc., Blue Apron, LLC, Centaur Media USA, Inc., E-consultancy.com Ltd, Fab Commerce & Design, Inc., FanDuel Inc., FanDuel Ltd., Food52, Inc., Panjiva, Inc., Group Nine Media, Inc., Thrillist Media Group, Inc., Spongecell, Inc., Fiverr International Ltd., and Kick- starter, PBC; THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and jointly request that all defendants named herein shall have up to and including October 4, 2018 to submit an answer or otherwise respond to the respective Complaint or First Amended Complaint.
Dated: August 16, 2018 STUBBS, ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
Dated: August 16, 2018 KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES LLP
Dated: August 16, 2018 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP
cite Cite Document

No. 57

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Panjiva, Inc., 5:18-cv-03580, No. 57 (N.D.Cal. Oct. 4, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 60-1

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Panjiva, Inc., 5:18-cv-03580, No. 60-1 (N.D.Cal. Jul. 20, 2021)

cite Cite Document

No. 59-1

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Panjiva, Inc., 5:18-cv-03580, No. 59-1 (N.D.Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)

cite Cite Document

No. 57-1

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Panjiva, Inc., 5:18-cv-03580, No. 57-1 (N.D.Cal. Oct. 4, 2018)

cite Cite Document