• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
4 results

Roberts v. Google LLC et al

Docket 5:20-cv-07824, California Northern District Court (Nov. 5, 2020)
Judge James Donato, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionSan Jose
FlagsADRMOP, CLOSED, RELATE
Cause28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Plaintiff Smith Roberts
Defendant Google LLC
Defendant Alphabet Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Roberts v. Google LLC et al

Docket 3:20-cv-07824, California Northern District Court (Nov. 5, 2020)
Judge James Donato, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionSan Francisco
FlagsADRMOP, CLOSED, RELATE
Cause28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Plaintiff Smith Roberts
Defendant Google LLC
Defendant Alphabet Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Roberts v. Google LLC et al

Docket 4:20-cv-07824, California Northern District Court (Nov. 5, 2020)
Judge James Donato, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionOakland
FlagsADRMOP, CLOSED, RELATE
Cause28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Plaintiff Smith Roberts
Defendant Google LLC
Defendant Alphabet Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with jury demand( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15158190

Document Roberts v. Google LLC et al, 5:20-cv-07824, No. 1 (N.D.Cal. Nov. 5, 2020)
Complaint
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Plaintiff, Smith Roberts, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, brings this action for damages and equitable relief against Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. and alleges, based upon the investigation of counsel and on information and belief, as follows:
Assignment to the San Jose Division of this District is proper under Civil Local Rule 3-2(c) and (e) because a substantial part of the events or omissions which give rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in Santa Clara County, where Google LLC is headquartered.
The benefits of proceeding through the class action mechanism, including providing injured persons or entities with a method for obtaining redress for claims that might not be practicable to pursue individually and significantly reducing the burden on the court system of trying these cases
Google has behaved as alleged herein in an attempt to obtain a monopoly in the U.S. market for Android mobile apps and in-app purchases, with the effect being that competition is foreclosed, innovation is stifled, and consumer choice is gravely diminished.
Google has acted in an attempt to obtain a monopoly in the U.S. market for Android mobile apps and in-app purchases, with the effect being that competition is foreclosed, innovation is stifled, and consumer choice is gravely diminished.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search