• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
14 results

NetChoice v. Murrill et al

Docket 3:25-cv-00231, Louisiana Middle District Court (Mar. 18, 2025)
Judge John W. deGravelles, presiding, Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr
Constitutionality of State Statute
DivisionBaton Rouge
Cause28:1331 Fed. Question
Case Type950 Constitutionality of State Statute
Tags950 Constitutionality, State Statute, 950 Constitutionality, State Statute
DeadlineIf the parties do not require the Court's attention, they may file a joint motion for a scheduling order, which may include a request to cancel the April 2, 2025, status conference., A follow-up status conference is scheduled for April 2, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. via Zoom.
DeadlineLiz Murrill served on 3/19/2025, answer due 4/9/2025., Mike Dupree served on 3/19/2025, answer due 4/9/2025.
Plaintiff NetChoice
Defendant Liz Murrill
Defendant Mike Dupree
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 22 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge John W. deGravelles: Status Conference held ...

Document NetChoice v. Murrill et al, 3:25-cv-00231, No. 22 (M.D.La. Mar. 25, 2025)
A status conference was held before District Judge John W. deGravelles on March 25, 2025, with the following participants: PRESENT: Jeremy Evan Maltz, Louis M. Grossman Connell Lee Archey, Keith Fernandez, Randal J. Robert, Carey Jones Counsel for Plaintiff Counsel for Defendants Counsel for Plaintiff believes that discovery is not necessary to resolve the Preliminary Injunction Motion.
In contrast, counsel for Defendants believes that discovery is necessary to ensure the record is fully developed.
Counsel for Defendants indicates his client is willing to delay the implementation of the Act, scheduled for July 1, 2025, to allow for an orderly process in this case.
Counsel for Plaintiff appreciates the Attorney General’s willingness to delay implementation and will work with Defendants to establish a discovery and briefing schedule for the Preliminary Injunction Motion and to discuss Rule 26(f) disclosures.
If the parties do not require the Court's attention, they may file a joint motion for a scheduling order, which may include a request to cancel the April 2, 2025, status conference.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 21

Document NetChoice v. Murrill et al, 3:25-cv-00231, No. 21 (M.D.La. Mar. 25, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 19

Document NetChoice v. Murrill et al, 3:25-cv-00231, No. 19 (M.D.La. Mar. 24, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 18

Document NetChoice v. Murrill et al, 3:25-cv-00231, No. 18 (M.D.La. Mar. 24, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 17

Document NetChoice v. Murrill et al, 3:25-cv-00231, No. 17 (M.D.La. Mar. 24, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 6

Document NetChoice v. Murrill et al, 3:25-cv-00231, No. 6 (M.D.La. Mar. 18, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1

Document NetChoice v. Murrill et al, 3:25-cv-00231, No. 1 (M.D.La. Mar. 18, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 >>