• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
81 results

Avraham Goldstein, et al., Petitioners v. Professional Staff Congress/CUNY, et al.

Docket 24-71, Supreme Court of the United States (July 23, 2024)
Petitioner Avraham Goldstein, et al.
Respondent City of New York
Respondent Professional Staff Congress/CUNY
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Reply of Avraham Goldstein et al - Proof of Service

Document Avraham Goldstein, et al., Petitioners v. Professional Staff Congress/CUNY, et al., 24-71, Reply of Avraham Goldstein et al, Proof of Service (U.S. Dec. 20, 2024)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 20, 2024, three (3) copies of the REPLY BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS in the above-captioned case were served, as required by U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.5(c), on the following:
1115 H Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20002 (202) 78 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 20th day of Dece NOTARY PuBLIC District of Columbia My commission expires April 30, 2029.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of Avraham Goldstein et al - Certificate of Word Count

Document Avraham Goldstein, et al., Petitioners v. Professional Staff Congress/CUNY, et al., 24-71, Reply of Avraham Goldstein et al, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Dec. 20, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of Avraham Goldstein et al - Main Document

Document Avraham Goldstein, et al., Petitioners v. Professional Staff Congress/CUNY, et al., 24-71, Reply of Avraham Goldstein et al, Main Document (U.S. Dec. 20, 2024)
New York law already exempts certain public employees from exclusive union representation, such as “persons who may reasonably be designated ... managerial or confidential,” along with numerous carveouts and exceptions in additional subsections.
The Professors’ position thus presents no threat to the designation of exclusive representatives—for those who want such representation.3 And of course the vast majority of public employees around the Nation— approximately 64% in 2023—do not even have mandatory union representation.4 In short, the Professors’ rights of free association can easily be accommodated without upsetting New York’s labor relations scheme.
PSC’s ability to speak and bargain for 30,000 would be little diminished by the absence of six employees, while the Professors’ First Amendment rights, and freedoms of conscience and religion, would remain intact.5 PSC and CUNY’s other justification for compulsory union representation is equally unpersuasive.
The Professors’ Proposal Harmonizes This Court’s Caselaw PSC and CUNY ignore the actual scope of Knight and fail to account for the Professors’ constitutional right to dissociate themselves from objectionable organizations and speech.
More generally, it beggars the imagination to believe that, when this Court decided Knight in 1984, it intended to declare it constitutional for states to prohibit Zionist Jews from dissociating from a union’s representation to protest its anti-Semitic stances.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioners Avraham Goldstein - Proof of Service

Document Avraham Goldstein, et al., Petitioners v. Professional Staff Congress/CUNY, et al., 24-71, Reply of petitioners Avraham Goldstein, Proof of Service (U.S. Dec. 20, 2024)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 20, 2024, three (3) copies of the REPLY BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS in the above-captioned case were served, as required by U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.5(c), on the following:
1115 H Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20002 (202) 78 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 20th day of Dece NOTARY PuBLIC District of Columbia My commission expires April 30, 2029.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioners Avraham Goldstein - Main Document

Document Avraham Goldstein, et al., Petitioners v. Professional Staff Congress/CUNY, et al., 24-71, Reply of petitioners Avraham Goldstein, Main Document (U.S. Dec. 20, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioners Avraham Goldstein - Certificate of Word Count

Document Avraham Goldstein, et al., Petitioners v. Professional Staff Congress/CUNY, et al., 24-71, Reply of petitioners Avraham Goldstein, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Dec. 20, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of respondents City University of - Proof of Service

Document Avraham Goldstein, et al., Petitioners v. Professional Staff Congress/CUNY, et al., 24-71, Brief of respondents City University of, Proof of Service (U.S. Dec. 6, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 6 >>