• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
5 results

Monica Richards v. Eli Lilly & Company, et al

Docket 24-2574, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit (Sept. 9, 2024)
Civil Rights - Jobs (Appeals)
Case Type3442 Civil Rights - Jobs
Tags3442 Civil Rights, Jobs, 3442 Civil Rights, Jobs
Plaintiff - Appellee MONICA RICHARDS, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals
Defendant - Appellant ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant LILLY USA, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 31 Amicus brief filed by Amicus Curiae Julie A. Su government filing, no consent necessary

Document Monica Richards v. Eli Lilly & Company, et al, 24-2574, No. 31 (7th Cir. Dec. 4, 2024)
Nonetheless, if this Court were to adopt a standard more demanding than the modest factual showing that district courts in this Circuit generally apply under 2 Case: 24-2574 Document: 31 Filed: 12/04/2024 Pages: 40 FLSA Section ...
If this Court were nonetheless to reject that approach and prescribe a heightened standard for authorizing notice to similarly-situated employees, it should emphasize to district courts the importance of considering equitably tolling the ...
This Court reversed because the district court failed to consider whether subgroups of employees could nonetheless be similarly situated and remanded so that the district court could consider, in its discretion, whether a collective action ...
Such discovery and notice are well- settled tools for managing collective actions, and none of the circumstances of this case suggest that the district court abused its discretion.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

No. 28 Amicus brief filed by Amici Curiae National Employment Lawyers Association and NELA/Illinois ...

Document Monica Richards v. Eli Lilly & Company, et al, 24-2574, No. 28 (7th Cir. Dec. 3, 2024)
Finding Common Ground in the Debate Over Wage Collective Actions with Best Practices for Litigation and Adjudication, FEDERAL COURTS LAW REVIEW, Vol.
NELA/Illinois provides legal education programs, technical support, and networking benefits to the attorneys, arbitrators, mediators, and law students interested in advancing employees’ rights who collectively constitute its membership.
By basing its opinion on these rules, and expressly declining to prescribe the “details” of the “exercise” of “the trial court’s [§ 216(b)] discretion,” Hoffman-La Roche indicates Case: 24-2574 Document: 28 Filed: 12/03/2024 Pages: 37 circuit courts should not enforce one-size-fits-all approaches to § 216(b).
Finding Common Ground in the Debate Over Wage Collective Actions with Best Practices for Litigation and Adjudication, FEDERAL COURTS LAW REVIEW, Vol.
At that time, many courts permitted joinder of claims involving “any common question of law or fact” that arose from the “same transaction or series of transactions.” Trapp v. Gordon, 366 Ill. 102, 108, 7 N.E.2d 869, 872–73 (1937); Hutteball v. Montgomery, 187 Wash. 407, 410, 60 P.2d 80, 82 (1936); Munson Inland Lines v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 36 F.2d 269, 271 (S.D.N.Y. 1929).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 19

Document Monica Richards v. Eli Lilly & Company, et al, 24-2574, No. 19 (7th Cir. Oct. 7, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 12

Document Monica Richards v. Eli Lilly & Company, et al, 24-2574, No. 12 (7th Cir. Sep. 30, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search