• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
3 results

Liquidia Technologies, Inc., Applicant v. United Therapeutics Corporation

Docket 23A565, Supreme Court of the United States (Dec. 19, 2023)
Petitioner Liquidia Technologies Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Application to extend the time to file a - Proof of Service

Document Liquidia Technologies, Inc., Applicant v. United Therapeutics Corporation, 23A565, Application to extend the time to file a, Proof of Service (U.S. Dec. 15, 2023)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 15, 2023, one (1) copy of the APPLICATION FOR AN
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUITin the above-captioned case was served, as required by U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.5(c), on the following:
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 100 Northern Avenue Boston, MA 02210
18565 Jamboree Road Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92612-2565
District of Columbia My commission expires March 14, 2028. eee tttay © S-14-2a }
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Application to extend the time to file a - Main Document

Document Liquidia Technologies, Inc., Applicant v. United Therapeutics Corporation, 23A565, Application to extend the time to file a, Main Document (U.S. Dec. 15, 2023)
... Ltd, 861 F. App'x 443,450 (Fed. Cir. 2021) (nonprecedential) ("[R]egardless of the forum, prior art patents and publications enjoy a presumption of enablement, and the patentee/applicant has the burden to prove nonenablement ...
... acceptable [salt thereof]"); Tr. at 462 :15- 24 (Winkler) (confirming that the product claimed by the product-by-process claims "could just be Treprostinil")). shifts to the applicant to submit rebuttal evidence of nonenablement.").
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search