• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
64 results

No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act, et al., ...

Docket 23-926, Supreme Court of the United States (Feb. 27, 2024)
Petitioner No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act, et al.
Respondent David Chiu, et al.
Other Citizen Action Defense Fund
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Supplemental brief of petitioners No on - Certificate of Word Count

Document No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act, et al., Petitioners v. David Chiu, in His Official Capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, et al., 23-926, Supplemental b...
SAN FRANCISCO ADVOCACY; and TODD DAVID, Petitioners,
DAVID CHIU, in his official capacity as San Francisco City Attorney; SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION; BROOKE JENKINS, in her official capacity as San Francisco District Attorney; and CITY AND COUNTY
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the document contains 635 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Notary Public State of New York No. 01BR6004935 Qualified in Richmond County Commission Expires March 30, 2026
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Supplemental brief of petitioners No on - Main Document

Document No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act, et al., Petitioners v. David Chiu, in His Official Capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, et al., 23-926, Supplemental b...
The original law required Petitioners to include disclaimers that took up 23% of a mailer, 35% of a newspaper ad, and 51% of a video ads’ screen.
Respondents told this Court that compelling political committees to identify secondary donors as part of their ads is “vital” to informing the electorate.
They argued that the city’s interest here “is of a great magnitude,” id. at 13 (cleaned up), because the information is “valuable” to the voters, id. “Without [the old version of] Proposition F,” Respondents claimed, “political committees would continue to be able to hoodwink the public .
Third, the change does not address two other reasons for granting certiorari: clarifying the standard of review, Pet.18-22, and, most critically, resolving the constitutionality of publicizing the identity of so-called secondary donors, id. 22-24, 29-30.
Those problems range from spreading “misinformation,” Van Hollen v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 811 F.3d 486, 497-98 (D.C. Cir. 2016), to having donors withhold support out of fear that the secondary-donor rule might be triggered, Reply 9; Pet. App. 66a-67a, 129a.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Supplemental brief of petitioners No on - Proof of Service

Document No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act, et al., Petitioners v. David Chiu, in His Official Capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, et al., 23-926, Supplemental b...
DAVID CHIU, in his official capacity as San Francisco City Attorney; SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION; BROOKE JENKINS, in her official capacity as San Francisco District Attorney; and CITY AND COUNTY
) ) I, Mathew Planalp, being duly sworn according to law and being over the age of 18, upon my oath depose and say that:
That on the 25th day of September, 2024, I served the within Petitioners’ Supplemental Brief in the above-captioned matter upon: Tara M. Steeley Deputy City Attorney City Hall, Room 234 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102-4602 415.554.4655 tara.steeley@sfcityatty.org by sending three copies of same, addressed to each individual respectively, through the Overnight Next Day Federal Express.
That on the same date as above, I sent to this Court forty copies of the within Petitioners’ Supplemental Brief through the Overnight Next Day Federal Express, postage prepaid.
Notary Public State of New York No. 01BR6004935 Qualified in Richmond County Commission Expires March 30, 2026
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Supplemental brief of respondents David - Proof of Service

Document No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act, et al., Petitioners v. David Chiu, in His Official Capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, et al., 23-926, Supplemental b...
I, Ann Tosel, being duly sworn according to law and being over the age of 18, upon my oath depose and say that:
That on the 23rd day of September, 2024, I served the within Respondents’ Supplemental Brief in the above-captioned matter upon: Alan Gura Counsel of Record Institute for Free Speech 1150 Connecticut Avenue N.W.
Suite 801 Washington, DC 20036 202.301.3300 agura@ifs.org by sending three copies of same, addressed to each individual respectively, through Priority Mail.
That on the same date as above, I sent to this Court forty copies of the within Respondents’ Supplemental Brief through the Overnight Next Day Federal Express, postage prepaid.
Notary Public State of New York No. 01BR6004935 Qualified in Richmond County Commission Expires March 30, 2026
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Supplemental brief of respondents David - Certificate of Word Count

Document No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act, et al., Petitioners v. David Chiu, in His Official Capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, et al., 23-926, Supplemental b...
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the document contains 469 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on this 23rd day of September, 2024.
Sworn to and subscribed before me on this 23rd day of September, 2024.
Notary Public State of New York No. 01BR6004935 Qualified in Richmond County Commission Expires March 30, 2026
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Supplemental brief of respondents David - Main Document

Document No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act, et al., Petitioners v. David Chiu, in His Official Capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, et al., 23-926, Supplemental b...

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioners No on E San - Main Document

Document No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act, et al., Petitioners v. David Chiu, in His Official Capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, et al., 23-926, Reply of petition...

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 >>