• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
18 results

MRP Properties Company, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. United States

Docket 23-687, Supreme Court of the United States (Dec. 27, 2023)
Petitioner MRP Properties Company, LLC, et al.
Respondent United States
Other American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers and Western States Petroleum Association
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Reply of petitioners MRP Properties - Proof of Service

Document MRP Properties Company, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. United States, 23-687, Reply of petitioners MRP Properties, Proof of Service (U.S. May. 16, 2024)
I, Simone Cintron, being duly sworn according to law and being over the age of 18, upon my oath depose and say that:
That on the 16th day of May, 2024, I served the within Reply Brief for the Petitioner in the above-captioned matter upon: Elizabeth Prelogar Solicitor General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
That on the same date as above, forty copies of the within Reply Brief for the Petitioner through the Overnight Next Day Federal Express, postage prepaid.
Notary Public State of New York No. 01BR6004935 Qualified in Richmond County Commission Expires March 30, 2026 #329512
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioners MRP Properties - Certificate of Word Count

Document MRP Properties Company, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. United States, 23-687, Reply of petitioners MRP Properties, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. May. 16, 2024)
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the document contains 2,997 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on this 16th day of May, 2024.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 16th day of May, 2024.
Notary Public State of New York No. 01BR6004935 Qualified in Richmond County Commission Expires March 30, 2026 #329512
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioners MRP Properties - Main Document

Document MRP Properties Company, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. United States, 23-687, Reply of petitioners MRP Properties, Main Document (U.S. May. 16, 2024)
The government nonetheless con- tends that the OPA (the statute at issue in Nature’s Way) and CERCLA “require distinct legal inquiries.” Opp. 20.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of respondent United States in - Proof of Service

Document MRP Properties Company, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. United States, 23-687, Brief of respondent United States in, Proof of Service (U.S. May. 2, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of respondent United States in - Main Document

Document MRP Properties Company, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. United States, 23-687, Brief of respondent United States in, Main Document (U.S. May. 2, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Motion to extend the time to file a - Main Document

Document MRP Properties Company, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. United States, 23-687, Motion to extend the time to file a, Main Document (U.S. Mar. 29, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Motion to extend the time to file a - Main Document

Document MRP Properties Company, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. United States, 23-687, Motion to extend the time to file a, Main Document (U.S. Feb. 23, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 >>