• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 204-218 of 226 results

Response to Applicants Third - Other

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Response to Applicants Third, Other (U.S. Oct. 10, 2023)
So there was something weird about Matt being a political appointee and where he could sit in the org chart, so none of us technically reported up to him.
... that -- when I use that term I'm using your term for kind of routing disinformation concerns and misinformation concerns to the social media platforms; correct? A. Correct, yeah, as far as I'm aware there was no -- there was none ...
Q. Did either of these pilots ever get any actual programming, something that you used? A. No. The rules we operated the pilot on was that none of it could be used for operational purposes, because there's privacy requirements around ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Response to Applicants Third - Main Document

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Response to Applicants Third, Main Document (U.S. Oct. 10, 2023)
Starting in 2018, in conjunction with the FBI’s and congressional staffers’ pressure campaigns, CISA launched virtually endless series of meetings with social-media companies to discuss the censorship of supposed “misinformation” and “disinformation” on their platforms.
As the Fifth Circuit held, “CISA—working in close connection with the FBI—held regular industry meetings with the platforms concerning their moderation policies, pushing them to adopt CISA’s proposed practices for addressing ‘mis-, dis-, and mal-information.’” Slip Op.
“In the spring and summer of 2022, CISA’s Protentis requested that social-media platforms prepare a ‘one-page’ document that sets forth their content- moderation rules that could then be shared with election officials—and which also included ‘steps for flagging or escalating MDM content’ and how to report misinformation.” Pet. App’x 76a.
1 In presenting such “debunking” information to platforms to urge them to remove content, CISA always assumed—without any independent research—that the government was the reliable source, and that the social-media user was unreliable, even for first-hand accounts: “if there was a public statement that was put out by the jurisdiction, we would … defer to that.” Resp. Supp.
If the Court grants certiorari at this time, it should add Respondents’ proposed Questions Presented: (1) Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in vacating the provision of the district court’s preliminary injunction that prevents federal officials from collaborating with the Election Integrity Partnership, the Virality Project, and similar government/private consortia to censor Americans’ speech on social media; and (2) Whether the Fifth Circuit’s formulation of the standards for government action provide sufficient protection for fundamental First Amendment interests.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Third Supplemental Memorandum Regarding - Proof of Service

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Third Supplemental Memorandum Regarding, Proof of Service (U.S. Oct. 5, 2023)
No. 23A243 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VIVEK H. MURTHY, SURGEON GENERAL, ET AL., APPLICANTS v. MISSOURI, ET AL. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE It is hereby certified that all
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Supplemental Letter from Missouri et al - Main Document

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Supplemental Letter from Missouri et al, Main Document (U.S. Oct. 3, 2023)
21 “With very limited exceptions, none applicable to this case, censorship—‘an effort by administrative methods to prevent the dissemination of ideas or opinions thought dangerous or offensive,’ as distinct from punishing such ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Supplemental Memorandum Regarding - Proof of Service

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Supplemental Memorandum Regarding, Proof of Service (U.S. Sep. 26, 2023)
No. 23A243 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES [See Attached Service List] VIVEK H. MURTHY, SURGEON GENERAL, ET AL.., APPLICANTS v. MISSOURI, ET AL. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE It is hereb
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Letter to the Clerk filed by Missouri et - Main Document

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Letter to the Clerk filed by Missouri et, Main Document (U.S. Sep. 26, 2023)
As noted in our letter of yesterday, on September 25, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an order granting panel rehearing.
The new order recalls the Fifth Circuit’s mandate; orders the Government to respond to Plaintiffs-Appellees’ Petition for Panel Rehearing by September 28, 2023, at 12:00 p.m.; and stays the district court’s preliminary injunction pending resolution of the Petition for Panel Rehearing.
Senior Counsel Office of the Attorney General Supreme Court Building 207 W. High St. P.O.
Joseph R. Biden, Jr.; Vivek H. Murthy; Xavier Becerra; Department of Health & Human Services; Anthony Fauci; Et al.,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellants are directed to file a response to the petition for rehearing by September 28, 2023, at 12:00 p.m.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Second Supplemental Memorandum Regarding - Proof of Service

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Second Supplemental Memorandum Regarding, Proof of Service (U.S. Sep. 26, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Second Supplemental Memorandum Regarding - Main Document

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Second Supplemental Memorandum Regarding, Main Document (U.S. Sep. 26, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Supplemental Memorandum Regarding - Main Document

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Supplemental Memorandum Regarding, Main Document (U.S. Sep. 26, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Supplemental Letter from Missouri et al - Main Document

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Supplemental Letter from Missouri et al, Main Document (U.S. Sep. 25, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of applicant Vivek H Murthy et al - Reply

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Reply of applicant Vivek H Murthy et al, Reply (U.S. Sep. 21, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Kennedy - Proof of Service

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Brief amicus curiae of Kennedy, Proof of Service (U.S. Sep. 20, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Response to application from respondent - Proof of Service

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Response to application from respondent, Proof of Service (U.S. Sep. 20, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Response to application from respondent - Main Document

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Response to application from respondent, Main Document (U.S. Sep. 20, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Michael Benz - Proof of Service

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Brief amicus curiae of Michael Benz, Proof of Service (U.S. Sep. 20, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14 15 16 >>