• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 39-49 of 49 results

Brief amicus curiae of Alliance - Proof of Service

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Brief amicus curiae of Alliance, Proof of Service (U.S. Aug. 31, 2022)
Supreme Court of the Anited States
PRESIDENT OF THE STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN,etal., Respondents.
I HEREBY CERTIFY thatall parties required to be served, have been served, on this 31“ day of August, 2022, in accordance with U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.3, three (3) copies of the foregoing BRIEF OF ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM AS AMICUS CURIAEIN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERbyplacing said cupies in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, addressedaslisted below.
“tiling,
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Pelican Institute - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Brief amicus curiae of Pelican Institute, Main Document (U.S. Aug. 31, 2022)
This committee was tasked with recommending positions on legislation “involving is- sues affecting the profession, the regulation of attor- neys and the practice of law, the administration of justice, the availability and delivery of legal services to society, [and] the improvement of the courts and the
Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse, Tort reform in Louisi- ana (2021).15 Candidates who pledged to improve the state’s business climate and address the conditions re- sulting in the U.S.’s second-highest auto insurance rates gained majorities in the house and senate.
The Legislation Committee cited this policy position to back one measure, a 2018 bill that sought to prohibit elementary and secondary schools that receive state funds from discriminating based on gender identity or sexual orientation.
Except to the extent that Louisiana lawyers use Loui- siana roads to drive to and from their offices, the courts, or depositions, a great deal of mental flexibility is required to see how the use of mandatory dues to support any advocacy on this bill is justified.
procedure, the judicial system, access to the courts, the compensation of judges or lawyers, or the legal profes- sion, and to responding to any requests for information received from the legislature.”21 The LSBA continues to engage in non-germane speech despite this pledge.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Mackinac Center - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Brief amicus curiae of Mackinac Center, Main Document (U.S. Aug. 30, 2022)
pdf ...................................................................... 10, 11 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES – Continued Page Bradley A. Smith and Alan Falk, The Limits of Compulsory Professionalism: Does a Unified Bar Make Sense for Michigan?, https://www.
Under exacting scrutiny, integrated bars are unable to command mandatory dues for the purpose of speaking on public matters if the same government interest could be served through means that are less restrictive.
They rely on dicta from Harris, 573 U.S. at 655-656, to the effect that the regulatory framework for lawyers, including detailed ethics rules, provides the states with a strong interest in allocating that ex- pense to members of the bar.
While it did not abolish the integrated bar, it restricted what mandatory fees can be used for to a greater extent than did Keller, and it is more in accord with the practice of voluntary-membership states where lawyers only pay for licensing, ethics, and disciplinary functions.
Online 1 (2020).7 Prof. Levin examines both voluntary and inte- grated bar states and considers, among other things, effective lawyer regulation, public benefits, quality of legal services, continuing education, and access to the law programs.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Mackinac Center - Certificate of Word Count

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Brief amicus curiae of Mackinac Center, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Aug. 30, 2022)
KATHLEEN BROST, in her official capacity as President of the State Bar of Wisconsin, et al., Respondents.
the BRIEF OF AMICUS that As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify CURIAE MACKINAC CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER in the above entitled case complies with the typeface requirement of Supreme Court Rule 33.1(b), being prepared in New Century Schoolbook 12 point for the text and 10 point for the footnotes, and this brief contains 3119 words, excluding the parts that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d), as needed.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30th day of August, 2022.
I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Mackinac Center - Proof of Service

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Brief amicus curiae of Mackinac Center, Proof of Service (U.S. Aug. 30, 2022)
KATHLEEN BROST, in her official capacity as President of the State Bar of Wisconsin, et al., Respondents.
All parties required to be served have been served by Priority Mail.
Packages were plainly addressed to the following:
I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Waiver of right of respondents Chief - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Waiver of right of respondents Chief, Main Document (U.S. Aug. 24, 2022)
(Respondent) I DO NOT INTEND TO FILE A RESPONSE to the petition for a writ of certiorari unless one is requested by the Court.
Please check the appropriate box: I am filing this waiver on behalf of all respondents.
I am filing this waiver on behalf of the following respondent(s): Chief Justice Annette Ziegler, and Justices Patience Roggensack, Ann Walsh Bradley, Rebecca Grassl Bradley, Rebecca Dallet, Brian Hagedorn, and Jill Karofsky, in their official capacities as members of the Wisconsin Supreme Court Please check the appropriate box: I am a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States.
(Filing Instructions: Mail the original signed form to: Supreme Court, Attn: Clerk’s Office, 1 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20543).
cc: Daniel Robert Suhr Liberty Justice Center 440 North Wells Street Chicago, IL 60654
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Motion of Kathleen Brost and Larry - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Motion of Kathleen Brost and Larry, Main Document (U.S. Aug. 24, 2022)
August 24, 2022 By Hand Delivery and Electronic Filing Scott S. Harris Clerk of Court Supreme Court of the United States One First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20543-0001 File v. Brost, et al., No. 22-95 Re: Dear Mr. Harris: I represent Respondents Kathleen Brost and Larry Martin in the above-captioned case, which was docketed on August 1, 2022.
I respectfully request a 30-day extension of time, to and including September 30, 2022, in which to file the brief in opposition currently due on August 31, 2022.
A 30-day extension to and including September 30, 2022 will ensure that we have sufficient time to fully analyze and respond to the arguments raised in the petition for certiorari and supporting amicus briefs in this case.
Sincerely,
Christopher E. Mills Daniel R. Suhr Counsel for Petitioner Clayton P. Kawski Sean M. Murphy Counsel for Respondent Members of the Wisconsin Supreme Court
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed - Appendix

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Bost, et al., 22-95, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Appendix (U.S. Jul. 28, 2022)
... member as follows: Supreme Court Justices, the full amount; judicial members, two-thirds; senior ac- tive members, one-half effective in the year the mem- ber attains the age of 75; inactive members, one-half; emeritus members, none; ...
After two consecu- tive nonexcused absences from meetings of any com- App.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed - Proof of Service

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Bost, et al., 22-95, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Proof of Service (U.S. Jul. 28, 2022)
I, Andrew Cockle, of lawful age, being duly sworn, upon my oath state that I did, on the 28th day of July, 2022, send out from Omaha, NE 2 package(s) containing 3 copies of the PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI in the above entitled case.
All parties required to be served have been served by Priority Mail.
Packages were plainly addressed to the following: To be filed for:
I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.
Roberta F. Howell Andrew C. Gresik FOLEY & LARDNER LLP Suite 5000 150 E. Gilman Street P.O.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed - Petition

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Bost, et al., 22-95, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Petition (U.S. Jul. 28, 2022)
None of this is constitutional, and the Court’s recent precedents recognize as much.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed - Certificate of Word Count

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Bost, et al., 22-95, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Jul. 28, 2022)
certify that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari contains 8,800 words, excluding those parts of the document exempted by Rule 33.1(d).
Daniel R. Suhr Counsel of Record Liberty Justice Center 440 N. Wells St., Ste.
200 Chicago, IL 60654
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search