• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 9-23 of 49 results

Brief of respondents Wisconsin Supreme - Proof of Service

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Brief of respondents Wisconsin Supreme, Proof of Service (U.S. Dec. 19, 2022)
Supreme Court of the Anited States
MARGARET HICKEY,etal., Petitioner, Respondents.
I HEREBY CERTIFYthat all parties required to be served, have been served, on this 19" day of December, 2022, in accordance with U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.3,three (3) copies of the foregoing BRIEF OF THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN OPPOSITION TO THE PETITION FOR CERTIORARIbyplacing said copies in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, addressed aslisted below.
Notary PUBLIC, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA My Commission Expires June 14, 2025.
SSNSaca etsee re} oF co’
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of respondents Wisconsin Supreme - Certificate of Word Count

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Brief of respondents Wisconsin Supreme, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Dec. 19, 2022)
In the Supreme Court of the United States
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(g) and (h), I certify that this document contains 3997 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
Executed on December 16, 2022.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Wisconsin - Certificate of Word Count

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Brief amicus curiae of Wisconsin, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Nov. 28, 2022)
No. 22-95 In The Supreme Court of the United States
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I declare that the Brief of Amicus Curiae contains 3,849 words, calculated using the word count function of Microsoft Word 2019, excluding parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Wisconsin - Proof of Service

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Brief amicus curiae of Wisconsin, Proof of Service (U.S. Nov. 28, 2022)
Supreme Court of the Anited States
PRESIDENT OF THE STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN,e¢ al., Respondents.
I HEREBY CERTIFYthatall parties required to be served, have been served, on this 28" day of November,2022, in accordance with U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.3, three (3) copies ofthe foregoing BRIEF.OF AMICUS CURIAE WISCONSIN INSTITUTE OF
by placingsaid copies in the U.S.mail, first class postage prepaid, addressed as attached.
er OF GAs "ronegas®
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Wisconsin - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Brief amicus curiae of Wisconsin, Main Document (U.S. Nov. 28, 2022)
But none succeeded.
None of the functions just discussed are managed by the SBW.
None of the potential outcomes of this case will alter this fact.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Motion to extend the time to file a - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Motion to extend the time to file a, Main Document (U.S. Nov. 3, 2022)
November 3, 2022 Via Electronic Filing Mr. Scott S. Harris Clerk of Court Supreme Court of the United States One First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20543-0001 Re: Schuler File v. Margaret Hickey, et al. No. 22-95 Dear Mr. Harris: I represent Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler and Justices Ann Walsh Bradley, Patience D. Roggensack, Rebecca Grassl Bradley, Rebecca Frank Dallet, Brian Hagedorn, and Jill J. Karofsky in the above case.
I respectfully request a 30-day extension of time to and including December 28, 2022, in which to file the brief in opposition currently due on November 28, 2022.
A 30-day extension to and including December 28, 2022, will ensure that we have sufficient time to fully analyze and respond to the arguments raised in the petition and supporting amicus curiae briefs in this case.
Sincerely, Clayton P. Kawski Assistant Attorney General CPK:jrs
Daniel R. Suhr, Counsel for Petitioner Roberta F. Howell, Counsel for Margaret Hickey and Larry Martin
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed - Certificate of Word Count

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Oct. 13, 2022)
certify that the Reply in Support of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari contains 2,975 words, excluding those parts of the document exempted by Rule 33.1(d).
Daniel R. Suhr Counsel of Record Liberty Justice Center 440 N. Wells St., Ste.
200 Chicago, IL 60654
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed, Main Document (U.S. Oct. 13, 2022)
None of that changes that this case is an ideal vehicle to answer the question that the Seventh Circuit and many other lower courts have left to this Court.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed - Proof of Service

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed, Proof of Service (U.S. Oct. 13, 2022)
I, Andrew Cockle, of lawful age, being duly sworn, upon my oath state that I did, on the 13th day of October, 2022, send out from Omaha, NE 2 package(s) containing 3 copies of the REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI in the above entitled case.
Packages were plainly addressed to the following: To be filed for:
I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.
Wisconsin Department of Justice 17 W. Main Street P.O.
Roberta F. Howell, Attorney Andrew C. Gresik, Attorney FOLEY & LARDNER LLP Suite 5000 150 E. Gilman Street P.O.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Notice of Substitution of Public Officer - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Notice of Substitution of Public Officer, Main Document (U.S. Sep. 29, 2022)
Re: File v. Brost, et al., No. 22-95 Dear Mr. Harris: I am counsel of record for Respondent President of the State Bar of Wisconsin, Kathleen Brost at the time this matter was filed, in the above-captioned matter.
I am writing regarding the automatic substitution of public officeholders under Supreme Court Rule 35.3.
Ms. Brost became a party to this matter in her official capacity as President of the State Bar of Wisconsin upon her election to that office.
During the pendency of this case, Margaret Hickey was elected President of the State Bar of Wisconsin.
Accordingly, Ms. Hickey respectfully requests that the Court amend the caption in this case to substitute her name for that of Ms. Brost as a party to this case in her official capacity as President of the State Bar of Wisconsin.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Letter of notice of substitution of - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Letter of notice of substitution of, Main Document (U.S. Sep. 29, 2022)
Re: File v. Brost, et al., No. 22-95 Dear Mr. Harris: I am counsel of record for Respondent President of the State Bar of Wisconsin, Kathleen Brost at the time this matter was filed, in the above-captioned matter.
I am writing regarding the automatic substitution of public officeholders under Supreme Court Rule 35.3.
Ms. Brost became a party to this matter in her official capacity as President of the State Bar of Wisconsin upon her election to that office.
During the pendency of this case, Margaret Hickey was elected President of the State Bar of Wisconsin.
Accordingly, Ms. Hickey respectfully requests that the Court amend the caption in this case to substitute her name for that of Ms. Brost as a party to this case in her official capacity as President of the State Bar of Wisconsin.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of respondents Margaret Hickey and - Proof of Service

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Brief of respondents Margaret Hickey and, Proof of Service (U.S. Sep. 29, 2022)
I, Andrew Cockle, of lawful age, being duly sworn, upon my oath state that I did, on the 29th day of September, 2022, send out from Omaha, NE 2 package(s) containing 3 copies of the BRIEF OF RESPONDENTS MARGARET HICKEY AND LARRY MARTIN IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI in the above entitled case.
All parties required to be served have been served by Priority Mail.
Packages were plainly addressed to the following:
I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of respondents Margaret Hickey and - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Brief of respondents Margaret Hickey and, Main Document (U.S. Sep. 29, 2022)
Nonetheless, this Court unanimously held in Keller that attorneys can be compelled to join an integrated bar.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of respondents Margaret Hickey and - Certificate of Word Count

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Brief of respondents Margaret Hickey and, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Sep. 29, 2022)
Supreme Court of the United States
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the Response to Petition for Certiorari filed in this matter contains 8,942 words, excluding parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Alliance - Certificate of Word Count

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Kathleen Brost, et al., 22-95, Brief amicus curiae of Alliance, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Aug. 31, 2022)
Supreme Court of the United States
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the Brief of Alliance Defending Freedom as Amicus Curiae contains 5,399 words, excluding the parts of the brief that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
Executed on August 30, 2022.
(IO Ax
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 >>