• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
49 results

Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al.

Docket 22-95, Supreme Court of the United States (Aug. 1, 2022)
Petitioner Schuyler File
Respondent Chief Justice Annette Ziegler, Justices Patience Roggensack, Ann Walsh Bradley, et al.
Respondent Margaret Hickey and Larry Martin
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed - Proof of Service

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed, Proof of Service (U.S. Jan. 3, 2023)
I, Andrew Cockle, of lawful age, being duly sworn, upon my oath state that I did, on the 3rd day of January, 2023, send out from Omaha, NE 2 package(s) containing 3 copies of the SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI in the above entitled case.
All parties required to be served have been served by Priority Mail.
Packages were plainly addressed to the following: To be filed for:
I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed - Certificate of Word Count

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Jan. 3, 2023)
certify that the Supplemental Reply in Support of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari contains 945 words, excluding those parts of the document exempted by Rule 33.1(d).
Daniel R. Suhr Counsel of Record Liberty Justice Center 440 N. Wells St., Ste.
200 Chicago, IL 60654
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Reply of petitioner Schuyler File filed, Main Document (U.S. Jan. 3, 2023)
After this Court called for a response from the Wisconsin Supreme Court Respondents, they filed a copycat brief in opposition that does not dispute the lead reason this case provides the perfect vehicle to reconsider Keller v. State Bar of California, 496 U.S. 1 (1990): the Wisconsin State Bar plays no role in the State’s “lawyer regulation system.” BIO 4; see App. 33.
1 The Wisconsin Supreme Court Respondents’ passing reference to the supposed absence of a freedom of association claim here (BIO 12) makes no more sense than the State Bar’s did.
No “developed record” (BIO 17) is necessary to resolve the pure legal question presented, and no such record would ever be developed if Keller remains good law.
Though these Respondents allude to “nuances” of Wisconsin’s scheme (id.), they neither articulate any such nuances nor explain why they would be relevant to the legal standard that should apply to compelled mandatory bar speech and association.
And the violation is even more severe here than in Janus, for Petitioner stands to lose his livelihood if he does not submit to the State’s efforts to “mould[] [our society] into patterns of conformity which satisfy the majority.” Lathrop, 367 U.S. at 885 (Douglas, J., dissenting).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of Chief Justice Annette Ziegler - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Brief of Chief Justice Annette Ziegler, Main Document (U.S. Dec. 19, 2022)
) Nonetheless, the Seventh Circuit held that it is solely this Court’s “role to decide whether [Keller] remains good law.” (Pet. App. 11–12.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of Chief Justice Annette Ziegler - Proof of Service

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Brief of Chief Justice Annette Ziegler, Proof of Service (U.S. Dec. 19, 2022)
Supreme Court of the Anited States
MARGARET HICKEY,etal., Petitioner, Respondents.
I HEREBY CERTIFYthat all parties required to be served, have been served, on this 19" day of December, 2022, in accordance with U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.3,three (3) copies of the foregoing BRIEF OF THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN OPPOSITION TO THE PETITION FOR CERTIORARIbyplacing said copies in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, addressed aslisted below.
Notary PUBLIC, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA My Commission Expires June 14, 2025.
SSNSaca etsee re} oF co’
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of Chief Justice Annette Ziegler - Certificate of Word Count

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Brief of Chief Justice Annette Ziegler, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Dec. 19, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of respondents Wisconsin Supreme - Main Document

Document Schuyler File, Petitioner v. Margaret Hickey, et al., 22-95, Brief of respondents Wisconsin Supreme, Main Document (U.S. Dec. 19, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 >>