• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
6 results

David L. Hildebrand, Petitioner v. Wilmar Corporation

Docket 22-5928, Supreme Court of the United States (Oct. 28, 2022)
Petitioner David L. Hildebrand
Respondent Wilmar Corporation
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Waiver of right of respondent Wilmar - Main Document

Document David L. Hildebrand, Petitioner v. Wilmar Corporation, 22-5928, Waiver of right of respondent Wilmar, Main Document (U.S. Nov. 18, 2022)
(Respondent) I DO NOT INTEND TO FILE A RESPONSE to the petition for a writ of certiorari unless one is requested by the Court.
I am filing this waiver on behalf of the following respondent(s): Please check the appropriate box: I am a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States.
(Filing Instructions: Mail the original signed form to: Supreme Court, Attn: Clerk's Office, 1 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20543).
Signature: Date: (Type or print) Name Michael A. Erbele 0 Mr. 0 Ms. 0 Mrs. 0 Miss Firm Merchant & Gould P.C.
No additional certificate of service or cover letter is required.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Petition for a writ of certiorari and - Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pau

Document David L. Hildebrand, Petitioner v. Wilmar Corporation, 22-5928, Petition for a writ of certiorari and, Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pau (U.S. Oct. 18, 2022)
(1) The petitioner asks leave to file the attached petition for a writ of certiorari without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis.
In support of my motion to proceed in forma pauperis, I state & declare under 28 U.S.C. 1746 that because of my poverty I am unable to pay the costs of this case or to give security therefore; and I believe I am entitled to redress.
Yes No Utilities (electricity, heating fuel water, sewer, and telephone) Home maintenance (repairs and upkeep) Food Clothing Laundry and dry-cleaning Medical and dental expenses
Have you paid - or will you be paying - anyone other than an attorney (such as a paralegal / or a typist) any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this form?
13.Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the costs of this case-' I currently owe investors over $250,000.00 for loans over the period of time I have been trying to protect my patent rights through several Federal Lawsuits (In addition to the time this litigation takes me away from normal work and income as well) I David L. Hildebrand state under penalty of perjury & declare under 28 U.S.C. 1746 that all the foregoing is true and correct.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Petition for a writ of certiorari and - Appendix

Document David L. Hildebrand, Petitioner v. Wilmar Corporation, 22-5928, Petition for a writ of certiorari and, Appendix (U.S. Oct. 18, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Petition for a writ of certiorari and - Petition

Document David L. Hildebrand, Petitioner v. Wilmar Corporation, 22-5928, Petition for a writ of certiorari and, Petition (U.S. Oct. 18, 2022)
The record also reflects that (in a rare instance), said trial also resulting in U.S, District Judge Johnson issuing an injunction; ordering any future sales and infringing acts to end by all the Defendant/infringers AND their associates/agents, in effort to protect Petitioners rights further moving forward.
Then (again), bating Petitioner Hildebrand into entering what now appears to be a deliberate & possibly fictitiously prepared settlement agreement, to avoid their clear liability for willful infringing acts they committed in excess of millions in sales/damages.
Wilmar’s CEO Mr. Nevil flew into Denver with agreement in hand, and respectfully, it should have ever been determined non enforceable by the district Court in any way under a rule 12 motion to dismiss (especially without any discovery on intent ever being allowed or addressed at the time).
Petitioner has attached relevant portions of the transcript of a hearing before the Federal Magistrate addressing Wilmar’s Motion to dismiss under rule 12.... ...it is specifically telling in what the concerns were of the court, over the potential luring of a litigant into an agreement possibly drafted purposefully to be non- enforceable.
Petitioner would be honored to assist in reviewing this case further at an oral argument before this Court, thus giving him an opportunity to speak for the average inventor that has no way of defending himself from the tactics that are used repeatedly by the likes of litigants such as Wilmar.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Petition for a writ of certiorari and - Proof of Service

Document David L. Hildebrand, Petitioner v. Wilmar Corporation, 22-5928, Petition for a writ of certiorari and, Proof of Service (U.S. Oct. 18, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search