• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
2 results

Sam Hargrove, et al v. Sleepys LLC

Docket 22-2040, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit (June 3, 2022)
Labor - Other (Appeals)
Case Type3790 Labor - Other
Tags3790 Labor, Other, 3790 Labor, Other
Plaintiff - Appellee SAM HARGROVE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellee ANDRE HALL, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellee MARCO EUSEBIO, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
...
cite Cite Docket

NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

Document Sam Hargrove, et al v. Sleepys LLC, 22-2040 (3rd Cir. Jun. 12, 2023)
The District Court denied certification, holding that the class was not “ascertainable based on objective criteria” because Sleepy’s records did not identify which drivers worked full time.
We concluded that Plaintiffs satisfied the ascertainability requirement by identifying a “reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining class membership.” Id. at 479 (citations omitted) (quoting Byrd v. Aaron’s Inc., 784 F.3d 154, 163 (3d Cir. 2015)).
“Class certification is proper only if the trial court is satisfied, after a rigorous analysis, that the prerequisites of Rule 23 are met.” In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig., 552 F.3d 305, 309 (3d Cir. 2008) (cleaned up).
“Common corporate policies” like these “carry great weight for certification purposes,” and “predominance is rarely defeated in cases where such uniform policies exist.” Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp., 934 F.3d 918, 944 (9th Cir. 2019) (cleaned up).
Plaintiffs can prove their claims through common evidence showing “the amount and extent of [their] work as a matter of just and reasonable inference.” Tyson Foods, 577 U.S. at 456 (quoting Anderson v. Mt.
cite Cite Document