Docket
21-1303,
Supreme Court of the United States
(Mar. 29, 2022)
Petitioner | Abigail Walsh, et al. |
Respondent | Amy Cohen, et al., Plaintiff-Appellees below |
Respondent | Brown University, Christina Paxson, as successor to Vartan Gregorian, and Jack Hayes, as successor to David Roach |
Cite Docket
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303 (U.S.)
+ More Snippets
Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Waiver of right of respondent Amy Cohen, Main Document (U.S. Apr. 4, 2...
All Plaintiff-Appellees in Case No. 21-1032, First Circuit Court of Appeals, as to which Petition for Certiorari is directed
Cite Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Waiver of right of respondent Amy Cohen, Main Document (U.S. Apr. 4, 2022
+ More Snippets
Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Waiver of right of respondents Brown, Main Document (U.S. Mar. 31, 202...
I DO NOT INTEND TO FILE A RESPONSE to the petition for a writ of certiorari unless one is requested by the Court.
® Brown University, Christina Paxson, as successor to Vartan Gregorian, and Jack Hayes, as successor to David Roach I only represent some respondents.
I am filing this waiver on behalf of the following respondent(s): Please check the appropriate box: I am a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States.
(Filing Instructions: Mail the original signed form to: Supreme Court, Attn: Clerk's Office, 1 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20543).
No additional certificate of service or cover letter is required.
Cite Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Waiver of right of respondents Brown, Main Document (U.S. Mar. 31, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Appendix (U.S. Mar. 25, 2022)
We nonetheless concluded “that Brown’s proposal to cut men’s teams [was] a permissi- ble means of effectuating compliance with the statute” and, thus, “the district court was wrong to reject out- of-hand Brown’s . . . plan.” Id. We ...
... named class representatives were incapable of adequately representing the class because none of them were cur- rently participating (or eligible to participate, for that matter) in Brown’s athletic programs. As the Objectors put it, none ...
BONSIGNORE: It’s difficult to understand how the class representatives, none of whom were Sprint customers at the time the settle- ment agreement was executed, had the interest much less incentive to stop Sprint from enforcing the ...
Cite Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Appendix (U.S. Mar. 25, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Proof of Service (U.S. Mar. 25,
AMY COHEN, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Respondents.
All parties required to be served have been served by Priority Mail.
Packages were plainly addressed to the following:
I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.
Cite Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Proof of Service (U.S. Mar. 25,
+ More Snippets
Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Certificate of Word Count (U.S.
AMY COHEN, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Respondents.
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI in the above entitled case complies with the typeface requirement of Supreme Court Rule 33.1(b), being prepared in New Century Schoolbook 12 point for the text and 10 point for the footnotes, and this brief contains 5893 words, excluding the parts that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d), as needed.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 25th day of March, 2022.
I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.
Cite Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Certificate of Word Count (U.S.
+ More Snippets
Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Petition (U.S. Mar. 25, 2022)
... serve as 6 a catalyst that would result in the revocation of the FACA Settlement was: a. b. c. the removal of the material terms individu- ally enumerated above; the placement of an end date on the often en- forced agreement where none ...
Notably, none of the core concerns were addressed by the District Court, who instead applied a new stan- dard of review that circumvents the offering of findings and analysis.
Cite Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed, Petition (U.S. Mar. 25, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Application to extend the time to file a, Lower Court Orders-Opinions (U.
We nonetheless concluded "that Brown's proposal to cut men's teams [was] a permissible means of effectuating compliance with the statute" and, thus, "the district court was wrong to reject out- of-hand Brown's . . . plan." Id. We ...
... Document: 00117803201 Page: 23 Date Filed: 10/27/2021 Entry ID: 6455319 class because none of them were currently participating (or eligible to participate, for that matter) in Brown's athletic programs. As the Objectors put it, none ...
Cite Document
Abigail Walsh, et al., Petitioners v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., 21-1303, Application to extend the time to file a, Lower Court Orders-Opinions (U.
+ More Snippets