• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
42 results

Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al., Petitioners v. Little Rock Fam...

Docket 20-1434, Supreme Court of the United States (Apr. 13, 2021)
Petitioner Leslie Rutledge, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arkansas, et al.
Respondent Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al.
Other State of Missouri and 21 other states
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Reply of petitioners Leslie Rutledge in - Main Document

Document Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al., Petitioners v. Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., 20-1434, Reply of petitioners Leslie Rutledge in, Main Document (U.S. Jul. 13, 202...
None of Respondents’ objections to review hold water.
But the differences they point to are minor, and none would make a difference under the Sixth Circuit’s 1 Respondents’ attempt, Opp.10, to paper over the disarray among the Circuits about the standard for reviewing abortion ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioners Leslie Rutledge in - Certificate of Word Count

Document Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al., Petitioners v. Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., 20-1434, Reply of petitioners Leslie Rutledge in, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Ju
Supreme Qtnurt at the Oflniteh States LESLIE RUTLEDGE, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arkansas, et al.,
Petitioners, LITTLE ROCK FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES, et al., Respondents.
0n Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the document contains 2,993 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioners Leslie Rutledge in - Proof of Service

Document Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al., Petitioners v. Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., 20-1434, Reply of petitioners Leslie Rutledge in, Proof of Service (U.S. Jul. 13, 20
Washington, DC.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 13, 2021, three (3) copies of the REPLY BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS in the above-captioned case were served, as required by US.
Supreme Court Rule 29.5(c), on the following:
775 H Street, NE.
District of Columbia My commission expires April 14, 2022.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Rule 296 Corporate Disclosure Statement - Main Document

Document Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al., Petitioners v. Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., 20-1434, Rule 296 Corporate Disclosure Statement, Main Document (U.S. Jul. 9, 2...
Supreme Court of the United States
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Pursuant to Rule 29.6, respondent Little Rock Family Planning Services states that it has no parent corporation and no publicly held corporation holds 10% or more of its stock.
Supreme Court of the United States
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of Little Rock Family Planning - Main Document

Document Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al., Petitioners v. Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., 20-1434, Brief of Little Rock Family Planning, Main Document (U.S. Jun. 28, 2021)
In the decision below, the Eighth Circuit correctly applied these longstanding principles to invalidate an Arkansas law barring abortion in cases where the pregnant person seeks care because of a fetal indica- tion of Down syndrome.
The Eighth Circuit also noted that the lower courts have consistently recognized that allowing the State to interrogate and pass upon a person’s reason for making the decision to end a pregnancy is anti- thetical to the core privacy right at issue.
Here, in contrast, it is “undisputed” that Arkan- sas’s Act 619 operates as “a complete prohibition of abortions based on the pregnant woman’s reason for exercising the right to terminate her pregnancy be- fore viability.” Pet. App. 10a (emphasis added); see id. at 4a, 7a-10a, 136a; see Pet. 32 (conceding that there is no dispute on “the severity” of the law’s effect in this case).
often lack the “access to affordable resources and sup- ports they need to live a healthy, comfortable life, in- cluding medical care, therapies, inclusion in schools, employment opportunities, and independent living.” See Dkt. 63, ¶¶ 6-8 (declaration of parent of child with Down syndrome in Arkansas) Instead of adopting any of these measures, the Ar- kansas legislature simply enacted Act 619 without consideration of any alternatives to advance the State’s purported interest.
Rather, it urged the Eighth Circuit to hold that “the existence of a ‘substantial ob- stacle’ [i]s ‘a sufficient basis for’ invalidating the chal- lenged regulations and no additional analysis or weighing [i]s necessary.” Response to Pet’n for Re- hearing En Banc 5, Hopkins v. Jegley, No. 17-2879 (8th Cir. Oct. 14, 2020) (quoting June Med.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of Little Rock Family Planning - Certificate of Word Count

Document Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al., Petitioners v. Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., 20-1434, Brief of Little Rock Family Planning, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Jun.
Supreme Court of the United States
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I, Kendall Turner, a member of the bar of this Court, hereby certify that, on this 28th day of June 2021, the Brief in Opposition in the above-captioned case contains 5,540 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of Little Rock Family Planning - Proof of Service

Document Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al., Petitioners v. Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., 20-1434, Brief of Little Rock Family Planning, Proof of Service (U.S. Jun. 28, 2021...
Supreme Court of the United States
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
I, Kendall Turner, a member of the bar of this Court, hereby certify that, on this 28th day of June 2021, all parties required by the Rules of this Court to be served have been served.
One copy of the Brief in Opposition was deposited with the U.S.
An electronic copy was also emailed to counsel at the email address on the service list.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 >>