• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
7 results

Aguiar-Perez v. Washoe County Jail

Docket 3:25-cv-00099, Nevada District Court (Feb. 19, 2025)
District Judge Anne R. Traum, presiding, Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney
Prisoner - Civil Rights
DivisionReno
Cause42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case Type550 Prisoner - Civil Rights
Tags550 Prisoner, Civil Rights, 550 Prisoner, Civil Rights
Plaintiff Aguiar-Perez
Defendant Washoe County Jail
Plaintiff Pedro Aguiar-Perez
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Martin v. USAA General Casualty Insurance Company et al.

Docket 2:25-cv-00099, Nevada District Court (Jan. 15, 2025)
Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon, presiding, Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III
Insurance
DivisionLas Vegas
Cause28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Case Type110 Insurance
Tags110 Insurance, 110 Insurance
DeadlineDiscovery due by 9/12/2025.
DeadlineMotions due by 10/14/2025.
Plaintiff Nicholas Martin
Defendant USAA General Indemnity Company
Plaintiff Martin
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 29 ORDER Granting 26 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to 12 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint

Document Martin v. USAA General Indemnity Company, 2:25-cv-00099, No. 29 (D.Nev. Mar. 5, 2025)
On January 31, 2025, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint.
On February 14, 2025, the Parties filed a stipulation to extend the time USAA Casualty Insurance Company, erroneously named as USAA General Casualty Insurance Company (“Defendant”) had to respond to February 28, 2025.
On February 27, 2025, Spencer Fane entered an appearance in the case.
Defendant expects a substitution of counsel to be on file in the next 14 days.
Given the short notice between Spencer Fane LLP entering the case (one day before the response to the Amended Complaint was due), and defense counsel’s international vacation from March 1-12, Plaintiff graciously granted new defense counsel the professional courtesy of extending the deadline to respond to the Amended Complaint from Friday, February 28, 2025, to Friday, March 10, 2025.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 28 ORDER granting 27 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to 14 Motion to Remand to State ...

Document Martin v. USAA General Indemnity Company, 2:25-cv-00099, No. 28 (D.Nev. Mar. 5, 2025)
Motion to Extend TimeGranted
On January 31, 2025, Plaintiff filed his Motion to Remand.
On February 5, 2025, the Parties filed a stipulation to extend the time to oppose the motion to remand until February 28,
On February 27, 2025, Spencer Fane entered an appearance in the case.
Defendant expects a substitution of counsel to be on file in the next 14 days.
Given the short notice between Spencer Fane LLP entering the case (one day before the Opposition to the Motion to Remand was due), and defense counsel’s international vacation from March 1-12, Plaintiff graciously granted new defense counsel the professional courtesy of extending the Opposition to the Motion to Remand from Friday, February 28, 2025, to Friday, March 10, 2025.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 21 ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 12 Amended Complaint

Document Martin v. USAA General Indemnity Company, 2:25-cv-00099, No. 21 (D.Nev. Feb. 18, 2025)
Motion to Extend TimeGranted
COMPANY, an unincorporated reciprocal insurance exchange; DOES 1 – X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I – X, inclusive, Defendants.
COME NOW, the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record and hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendant USAA General Indemnity Company to file their response to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, said response being due on February 14, 2025, be extended until February 28, 2025.
Reason for Extension Because of the complexity of the claims made in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, Defendant USAA General Indemnity Company needs additional time to perform an investigation prior to filing a responsive pleading.
This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose … … 152636613.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Thisis the first extension of time requested by counselforfiling Defendant USAA General 2||Indemnity Company’s response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 16

Document Martin v. USAA General Indemnity Company, 2:25-cv-00099, No. 16 (D.Nev. Feb. 6, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 9

Document Martin v. USAA General Indemnity Company, 2:25-cv-00099, No. 9 (D.Nev. Jan. 28, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search