• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
3 results

C. v. MGM Resorts International et al

Docket 2:24-cv-02027, Nevada District Court (Oct. 29, 2024)
Judge James C. Mahan, presiding, Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III
Statutory Actions - Other
11/14/2024
... must explicitly list the Bar Associations of which she is in good standing and provide accompanying certificates. The petitioner must also explicitly state "none" under question 8 if it does not apply. Local R...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 40 MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re 12 Motion to Dismiss, 11 Motion to Dismiss,, by Plaintiff ...

Document C. v. MGM Resorts International et al, 2:24-cv-02027, No. 40 (D.Nev. Nov. 15, 2024)
Motion to Extend Time
Plaintiff MARCY C. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC., ESA P PORTFOLIO L.L.C., and ESA P PORTFOLIO OPERATING LESSEE LLC (collectively “ESA”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: On November 1, 2024, ESA filed two motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint.
Plaintiff’s responses to those motions to dismiss are presently due today, November 15, 2024.
However, Plaintiff requires additional time to respond because ESA indicated it will not join the pending Stipulation and Order to Stay Case.
Trisha Delos Santos, Esq. Christopher T. Byrd, Esq. 6385 South Rainbow Blvd., Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Attorneys for Extended Stay America, Inc., ESA P Portfolio L.L.C., and ESA P Portfolio Operating Lessee LLC
Plaintiff’s time to respond to the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC., ESA P PORTFOLIO L.L.C., and ESA P PORTFOLIO OPERATING LESSEE LLC (ECF Nos. 11 & 12), shall be extended by fourteen (14) days, until November 29, 2024.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 19 First STIPULATION TO STAY CASE STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING STAYING ACTION AND EXTENDING ...

Document C. v. MGM Resorts International et al, 2:24-cv-02027, No. 19 (D.Nev. Nov. 4, 2024)
Motion to Stay
While the allegations in this case extend beyond those at issue in the Danford 24 criminal action, Plaintiff and Defendants nonetheless agree that TVPRA Section 1595(b) requires 25 the stay of this entire action.
Screened by: MIKELLE DAUGHERTY Assigned to: TO BE ASSIGNED INFORMATION DELQUAN MAURICE DANFORD DOB: 04/23/1991 SO#: NONE SID#/BCI#: NONE DAO # 23.003973 BAIL: NO BAIL WARRANT ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search