• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
2 results

HENDEL et al v. FAY SERVICING, LLC

Docket 2:22-cv-04983, New Jersey District Court (Aug. 9, 2022)
Judge Brian R. Martinotti, presiding
Bankruptcy Appeal
DivisionNewark
Cause28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Case Type422 Bankruptcy Appeal
Tags422 Bankruptcy Appeal, Appeal, 422 Bankruptcy Appeal, Appeal
Plaintiff Hendel
Defendant Fay Servicing, LLC
In Re RUDOLF H. HENDEL AND CATHERINE G. LIN-HENDEL
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 12 OPINION

Document HENDEL et al v. FAY SERVICING, LLC, 2:22-cv-04983, No. 12 (D.N.J. Mar. 24, 2023)
Appellants were instructed to submit a designation of record, a statement of issues specific to each appeal, and a brief consistent with the applicable rules, or they risk dismissal.
Appellants initially failed to timely file a designation of record with a statement of the issues specific to each appeal and a brief consistent with the applicable rules.
In their response, Appellants claim their “statement of issues specific and relevant to this appeal” was presented in their reply letter (ECF No. 6 at 3), which, again, was singly submitted in support of all appeals.
Appellants’ failure to submit a fully compliant designation of record, appeal-specific statement of the issues and corresponding, relevant transcript containing the Bankruptcy Court’s findings, conclusions, and reasoning for denying Appellants’ Motion for Reconsideration has prevented this Court from conducting an “informed, substantive appellate review,” and therefore warrants dismissal of the appeal.
5 Appellants received notice of possible dismissal for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (see ECF No. 4), yet again, failed to file a designation of record and statement of facts specific to this appeal.
cite Cite Document