• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
3 results

A.B.F. et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Docket 2:22-cv-00480, West Virginia Southern District Court (Oct. 26, 2022)
Senior Judge David A. Faber, presiding
Healthcare/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
DivisionCharleston
Flags25BG
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Case Type367 Healthcare/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Tags367 Healthcare / Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability, Personal Injury, Tort, Civil, 367 Healthcare / Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability, Personal Injury, Tort, Civil
Plaintiff A.b.f.
Defendant Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff A. B. F.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 105 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the deadlines set in the court's 103 Order of ...

Document A.B.F. et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al, 2:22-cv-00480, No. 105 (S.D.W.Va. May. 17, 2023)
Responses and replies to the motion (if any) are to be filed in the time periods set forth in the local rules.
3) A hearing on the motion to stay is SCHEDULED for June 7, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., in Charleston.
The court will also hear argument on the pending motions to dismiss at that time.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to any unrepresented parties.
David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 103 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AND ORDER AND NOTICE denying as moot Plaintiffs' 10 EMERGENCY ...

Document A.B.F. et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al, 2:22-cv-00480, No. 103 (S.D.W.Va. May. 8, 2023)
Motion to Remand
In those Notices, plaintiffs point out that their voluntary dismissal of claims against the West Virginia Board of Pharmacy moots the basis for seeking remand to state court.
06/07/23 Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) meeting and Scheduling Order Worksheet, available on the Court's website.
06/23/23 The provisions of FR Civ P 14 and 15 with respect to the time in which to file third-party claims and to amend pleadings without leave of court are not affected by this Order and Notice.
Pursuant to LR Civ P 16.1 and 73.1, the parties are informed of their opportunity to consent to the exercise by a magistrate judge of civil jurisdiction over the case, including entry of judgment, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 636.
When electronically filing documents with the Clerk's office, a paper courtesy copy to the assigned judicial officer is not required except where any motion, memorandum, response, or reply, together with documents in support thereof, is 50 pages or more in length, or where any administrative record is 75 or more pages in length.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search