• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
14 results

Burgerworks Texas et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Docket 9:22-cv-00172, Texas Eastern District Court (Aug. 24, 2022)
Michael J. Truncale, presiding
DivisionLufkin
Plaintiff Burgerworks Texas
Defendant Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

NetSocket, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Docket 2:22-cv-00172, Texas Eastern District Court (May 24, 2022)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding
Patent
DivisionMarshall
FlagsCLOSED, JRG2, JURY, MARKMANREF, PATENT/TRADEMARK, PROTECTIVE-ORDER
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff NetSocket, Inc.
Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.
Counter Claimant Cisco Systems, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Menger v. Wages et al

Docket 6:22-cv-00172, Texas Eastern District Court (May 5, 2022)
District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle, presiding, Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell
Anti-Trust
DivisionTyler
FlagsCASREF, CLOSED, JURY, KNM1
Cause15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Plaintiff Gusi J. Menger
Defendant Randy Wages
Defendant Kristy Wages
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Parrott v. Munch et al

Docket 1:22-cv-00172, Texas Eastern District Court (Apr. 26, 2022)
District Judge Marcia A. Crone, presiding, Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn
Prisoner - Civil Rights
DivisionBeaumont
FlagsCASREF, CLOSED, PROSE, SA7
Cause42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case Type550 Prisoner - Civil Rights
Tags550 Prisoner, Civil Rights, 550 Prisoner, Civil Rights
Plaintiff Parrott
Defendant Munch
Plaintiff Jimmie Mark Parrott, Jr
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Temple Building Systems Inc. v. Cox

Docket 4:22-cv-00172, Texas Eastern District Court (Mar. 3, 2022)
District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III, presiding
Contract - Other
DivisionSherman
FlagsJURY
Demand$75,000
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Case Type190 Contract - Other
Tags190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other, 190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other
Plaintiff Temple Building Systems Inc.
Defendant Traci Cox
Defendant Cox
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 163 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

Document NetSocket, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., 2:22-cv-00172, No. 163 (E.D.Tex. May. 29, 2024)
Motion for Claim Construction
B. “group of Network Resource Managers” Plaintiff’s Proposed Construction Plain and Ordinary Meaning; Not subject to 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 6; (not indefinite) Subject to 35 U.S.C. 112 ¶ 6 Function: “the steps of claim 1” Structure: none ...
... communicating on a common network level” (’966 Patent, Claim 1) Plaintiff’s Proposed Construction Defendant’s Proposed Construction Subject to 35 U.S.C. 112 ¶ 6 Function: “communicating on a common network level” Structure: none ...
As to Plaintiff’s alternative agument, Defendant responds that none of the purported structure is clearly linked to the claimed function.
... Plaintiff’s argument is unpersuasive because the issue is not whether a NRM could conceivably perform the function but rather is whether the patentee, having chosen to invoke 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6 by reciting a “means for,” nonetheless ...
E. “means for announcing a domain property label” “means for announcing a domain property label of the first domain to the second NRM” (’796 Patent, Claim 15) Defendant’s Proposed Construction Subject to 35 U.S.C. 112 ¶ 6 Function: “announcing a domain property label of the first domain to the second NRM” Structure: none (indefinite) Plaintiff’s Proposed Construction Function: announcing a domain property label of the first domain to the second NRM. Structure: The structure(s) disclosed at 1:15- 16; 5:4-16; 5:37-39; 5:46-6:34; 7:27-8:10; 8:40-41; ...
... a domain property label of the first domain to the second NRM” (’796 Patent, Claim 15) Construction Subject to 35 U.S.C. 112, ¶ 6 Function: “announcing a domain property label of the first domain to the second NRM” Structure: none ...
The Court therefore hereby construes these terms as set forth in the following chart: Term “means for performing an appropriate action comprises means for receiving a call from a requesting device and extending resource reservations from the NRM unit to a particular endpoint” (’796 Patent, Claim 22) Construction Subject to 35 U.S.C. 112, ¶ 6 Function: “performing an appropriate action comprises means for receiving a call from a requesting device and extending resource reservations from the NRM unit to a particular endpoint” Structure: none (indefinite) - 32 - Case 2:22-cv-00172-JRG Document 163 Filed 05/29/24 Page 33 of 55 PageID #: 4062 Subject to 35 U.S.C. 112, ¶ 6 Function: “receiving a call from a requesting device and extending resource reservations from the ...
The Court therefore hereby construes these terms as set forth in the following chart: Term “means for using an NRM path vector to identify a third NRM within a third domain” (’796 Patent, Claim 15) Construction Subject to 35 U.S.C. 112, ¶ 6 Function: “using an NRM path vector to identify a third NRM within a third domain” Structure: none (indefinite) - 35 - Case 2:22-cv-00172-JRG Document 163 Filed 05/29/24 Page 36 of 55 PageID #: 4065 “means for using the NRM path vector to detect denials and/or failures along a path, between the first endpoint and a third ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

No. 126 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 91 OPPOSED MOTION to Compel filed by NetSocket, Inc... Signed ...

Document NetSocket, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., 2:22-cv-00172, No. 126 (E.D.Tex. Mar. 15, 2024)
Motion to Compel
In August 2023, the Court held a telephonic status conference concerning the parties’ request to extend the trial setting by six months.
By November 21, 2023, Cisco had produced over a terabyte of code—over 4 million files—including current version of all source code within its possession, custody, and control for products identified in the complaint and infringement contentions.
Cisco contends that it is improper to broadly identify accused products with generic language about the “same or similar functionality.” (Id.) (citing Tivo Inc. v. Samsung Elecs.
Cisco’s contention that NetSocket “is not entitled to source code on uncharted products” is precisely the issue addressed by the Court in the August 2023 telephonic conference.
The issue before the Court as to this Motion to Compel is whether Cisco should be required to produce the Requested Code, not whether NetSocket is improperly accusing new products.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 106

Document NetSocket, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., 2:22-cv-00172, No. 106 (E.D.Tex. Nov. 21, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 >>