• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
2 results

Invoke LLC et al v. Combine Performance Golf LLC et al

Docket 2:20-cv-00906, Arizona District Court (May 8, 2020)
Judge Diane J Humetewa, presiding
Trademark
DivisionPhoenix
FlagsSTD
Demand$42,000
Cause15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Case Type840 Trademark
Tags840 Trademark, 840 Trademark
Plaintiff Invoke LLC
Plaintiff Virtue Vape LLC
Plaintiff John Abbey
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 27 ORDER - Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc

Document Invoke LLC et al v. Combine Performance Golf LLC et al, 2:20-cv-00906, No. 27 (D.Ariz. Oct. 14, 2020)
Motion to Dismiss (Demurrer)Granted
It began when Plaintiffs John Abbey (“Abbey”) and Catalina Jimenez (“Jimenez”) decided to help Defendant Michael Pinkey’s (“Pinkey”) company, Combine Performance Golf LLC (“Combine”), develop a line of nutrient supplements.
Finally, the Complaint alleges that Combine has not paid Invoke for its membership interest, that it has not repaid Virtue Vape’s loan, and that it continues to use the Trademark despite having no right to it.
In reviewing a motion to dismiss, “all factual allegations set forth in the complaint ‘are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs.’” Lee v. City of L.A., 250 F.3d 668, 679 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting Epstein v. Wash. Energy Co., 83 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 1996)).
Plaintiffs specifically bring Count I under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), which states that, “[a]ny person who, on or in connection with any goods or services ... uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device or any combination thereof .
As a result, it is not necessary to determine whether the Complaint states a claim for trademark infringement under Delaware law or whether the Court has personal jurisdiction over Brenkus.
cite Cite Document
Analyze