Docket
17 MM 2022,
Pennsylvania State, Supreme Court
(Mar. 7, 2022)
Case Type | Redistricting |
Petitioner | Eugene Boman |
| |
Participant | Bureau of Elections |
Cite Docket
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportionment Commission, Respondent, 17 MM 2022 (Pa.)
+ More Snippets
Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportio...
Respondent No. 4 WM 2022 Appeal from the Legislative Reapportionment Commission Plan dated February 4, 2022
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the above- captioned legislative reapportionment appeals filed pursuant to PA. CONST.
II, § 17(d) (indicating that “[a]ny aggrieved person may file an appeal from the final plan [of the 2021 Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission] directly to the Supreme Court”), this Court finds that the Final Reapportionment Plan of the Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission filed on February 4, 2022, is in compliance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution and is not contrary to law, and, therefore, shall have the force of law.
Further, it is hereby ordered that said Plan shall be used in all forthcoming elections to the General Assembly until the next constitutionally-mandated reapportionment shall be approved.
Our adjustment to that calendar is resolved by separate order at that docket number and entered today.
Cite Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportionment Commission,
+ More Snippets
Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportio...
Respondent No. 4 WM 2022 Appeal from the Legislative Reapportionment Commission Plan dated February 4, 2022
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the above- captioned legislative reapportionment appeals filed pursuant to PA. CONST.
II, § 17(d) (indicating that “[a]ny aggrieved person may file an appeal from the final plan [of the 2021 Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission] directly to the Supreme Court”), this Court finds that the Final Reapportionment Plan of the Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission filed on February 4, 2022, is in compliance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution and is not contrary to law, and, therefore, shall have the force of law.
Further, it is hereby ordered that said Plan shall be used in all forthcoming elections to the General Assembly until the next constitutionally-mandated reapportionment shall be approved.
Our adjustment to that calendar is resolved by separate order at that docket number and entered today.
Cite Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportionment Commission,
+ More Snippets
Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportio...
Respondent No. 4 WM 2022 Appeal from the Legislative Reapportionment Commission Plan dated February 4, 2022
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the above- captioned legislative reapportionment appeals filed pursuant to PA. CONST.
II, § 17(d) (indicating that “[a]ny aggrieved person may file an appeal from the final plan [of the 2021 Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission] directly to the Supreme Court”), this Court finds that the Final Reapportionment Plan of the Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission filed on February 4, 2022, is in compliance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution and is not contrary to law, and, therefore, shall have the force of law.
Further, it is hereby ordered that said Plan shall be used in all forthcoming elections to the General Assembly until the next constitutionally-mandated reapportionment shall be approved.
Our adjustment to that calendar is resolved by separate order at that docket number and entered today.
Cite Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportionment Commission,
+ More Snippets
Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportio...
Respondent No. 4 WM 2022 Appeal from the Legislative Reapportionment Commission Plan dated February 4, 2022
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the above- captioned legislative reapportionment appeals filed pursuant to PA. CONST.
II, § 17(d) (indicating that “[a]ny aggrieved person may file an appeal from the final plan [of the 2021 Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission] directly to the Supreme Court”), this Court finds that the Final Reapportionment Plan of the Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission filed on February 4, 2022, is in compliance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution and is not contrary to law, and, therefore, shall have the force of law.
Further, it is hereby ordered that said Plan shall be used in all forthcoming elections to the General Assembly until the next constitutionally-mandated reapportionment shall be approved.
Our adjustment to that calendar is resolved by separate order at that docket number and entered today.
Cite Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportionment Commission,
+ More Snippets
Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportio...
Respondent No. 4 WM 2022 Appeal from the Legislative Reapportionment Commission Plan dated February 4, 2022
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the above- captioned legislative reapportionment appeals filed pursuant to PA. CONST.
II, § 17(d) (indicating that “[a]ny aggrieved person may file an appeal from the final plan [of the 2021 Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission] directly to the Supreme Court”), this Court finds that the Final Reapportionment Plan of the Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission filed on February 4, 2022, is in compliance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution and is not contrary to law, and, therefore, shall have the force of law.
Further, it is hereby ordered that said Plan shall be used in all forthcoming elections to the General Assembly until the next constitutionally-mandated reapportionment shall be approved.
Our adjustment to that calendar is resolved by separate order at that docket number and entered today.
Cite Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportionment Commission,
+ More Snippets
Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportio...
Respondent No. 4 WM 2022 Appeal from the Legislative Reapportionment Commission Plan dated February 4, 2022
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the above- captioned legislative reapportionment appeals filed pursuant to PA. CONST.
II, § 17(d) (indicating that “[a]ny aggrieved person may file an appeal from the final plan [of the 2021 Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission] directly to the Supreme Court”), this Court finds that the Final Reapportionment Plan of the Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission filed on February 4, 2022, is in compliance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution and is not contrary to law, and, therefore, shall have the force of law.
Further, it is hereby ordered that said Plan shall be used in all forthcoming elections to the General Assembly until the next constitutionally-mandated reapportionment shall be approved.
Our adjustment to that calendar is resolved by separate order at that docket number and entered today.
Cite Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportionment Commission,
+ More Snippets
Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportio...
Respondent No. 4 WM 2022 Appeal from the Legislative Reapportionment Commission Plan dated February 4, 2022
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the above- captioned legislative reapportionment appeals filed pursuant to PA. CONST.
II, § 17(d) (indicating that “[a]ny aggrieved person may file an appeal from the final plan [of the 2021 Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission] directly to the Supreme Court”), this Court finds that the Final Reapportionment Plan of the Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission filed on February 4, 2022, is in compliance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution and is not contrary to law, and, therefore, shall have the force of law.
Further, it is hereby ordered that said Plan shall be used in all forthcoming elections to the General Assembly until the next constitutionally-mandated reapportionment shall be approved.
Our adjustment to that calendar is resolved by separate order at that docket number and entered today.
Cite Document
Ron Y. Donagi, Philip T. Gressman, Pamela Gorkin, David P. Marsh, James L. Rosenberger, Eugene Boman, Gary Gordon, Liz McMahon, Timothy Feeman,, et al. v. 2021 Legislative Reapportionment Commission,
+ More Snippets