If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of material changes in economic circumstances.

✔ G The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: Defendant be designated to a facility as close as possible to New York City.

as directed by the probation officer, the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agency in the location where you reside, work, are a student, or were convicted of a qualifying offense.

You must not own, possess, or have access to a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or dangerous weapon (i.e., anything that was designed, or was modified for, the specific purpose of causing bodily injury or death to another person such as nunchakus or tasers).

G the interest requirement for the G fine G restitution is modified as follows: * Amy, Vicky, and Andy Child Pornography Victim Assistance Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-299.

The Sentencing hearing previously set for May 28, 2024 is rescheduled to June 18, 2024 at 10:30AM in Courtroom 15C at the 500 Pearl Street Courthouse.

569 (LJL) With the Consent of the Government, Skyfield Requests his Sentencing Hearing be Rescheduled to the Week of June 17th.

Dear Judge Liman: In order to accommodate my work schedule, the Defense respectfully requests, with the consent of the Government, that Tyriek Skyfiled’s sentencing hearing be rescheduled to the week of June 17th.

Considering that sentencing is set for this Tuesday, May 28th, and having only received the Government’s submission on May 21st, which includes more than 30 exhibits, many of which are video recordings, I need to review this material with Skyfield at the MDC- Brooklyn, which I am unable to accomplish before the hearing.

Additionally, I intend to submit a reply to the Government’s submission which seeks a denial of Acceptance of Responsibility Points.

The Court grants a one-day extension of the motion in limine deadline, such that the parties’ motions are due January 4, 2023, and the parties’ responses remain due January 10, 2023.

A Change of Plea hearing is scheduled for January 3, 2024 at 2:00PM in Courtroom 15C at the 500 Pearl Street Courthouse.

569 (LJL) By ECF and Email The Honorable Lewis J. Liman United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: Dear Judge Liman: The Government writes to request that the Court schedule a change-of-plea hearing in the above-referenced matter for Wednesday, January 3, 2024.

The Government understands that the defendant intends to plead guilty to Count One of the Indictment at that hearing.

The Government also respectfully requests that the Court grant a one-day extension of the motion in limine deadline pending the defendant’s expected entry of a guilty plea, such that the parties’ motions are due January 4, 2023, and the parties’ responses remain due January 10, 2023.

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge:

The Court scheduled a hearing for December 19, 2023 regarding the outstanding bail, Dkt. No. 21, and dismissal and suppression, Dkt. No. 28, motions.

On December 14, 2023, the Government filed a letter motion requesting an order, prior to the hearing, that Defendant is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his suppression motion.

In the alternative, the Government requested an order limiting the scope of any evidentiary hearing on that motion.

The Court therefore grants the Government’s motion to the extent it is directed to the hearing on December 19, 2023, and reserves on the motion to the extent that the Government argues that the defense is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing.

The chronologies and related notes are ordered unsealed.

The Government has made and will make disclosure to the defendant of documents, objects and information, including electronically stored information (“ESI”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, and the Government’s general obligation to produce exculpatory and impeachment material in criminal cases, all of which will be referred to herein as “Disclosure Material.” The Government’s Disclosure Material may include material that (i) affects the privacy and confidentiality of individuals; (ii) would impede, if prematurely disclosed, the Government’s ongoing investigation of uncharged individuals; (iii) may be produced with more limited redactions than would otherwise be necessary; and (iv) is not authorized to be disclosed to the public or disclosed beyond that which is necessary for the defense of this criminal case.

Certain of the Government’s Disclosure Material, referred to herein as “Sealed Material,” contains information that identifies, or could lead to the identification of, witnesses who may be subject to intimidation or obstruction, and whose lives, persons, and 08.02.2023 property, as well as the lives, persons and property of loved ones, will be subject to risk of harm absent the protective considerations set forth herein.

Certain materials in this case raise a particular risk of affecting the privacy or safety of victims or witnesses, or the confidentiality of ongoing investigations.

Certain materials in this case raise a more significant risk of affecting the privacy or safety of victims or witnesses, or the confidentiality of ongoing investigations.

912-6 and any direct appeal therefrom; and the granting of any motion made on behalf of the Government dismissing any charges in the above-captioned case, whichever date is later, subject to defense counsel’s obligation to retain client files under the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Lewis J. Liman, United States District Judge: This Order is entered, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) and the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No 116–182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), to confirm the Government’s disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and to summarize the possible consequences of violating those obligations.

1 This Order does not purport to set forth an exhaustive list of the Government’s disclosure obligations.

In the event the Government believes that a disclosure under this Order would compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other substantial government interest, it may apply to the Court for a modification of its obligations, which may include in camera review or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of the information otherwise subject to disclosure.2 For purposes of this Order, the Government has an affirmative obligation to seek all information subject to disclosure under this Order from all current or former federal, state, and local prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and other officers who have participated in the prosecution, or investigation that led to the prosecution, of the offense or offenses with which the defendant is charged.

If the Government fails to comply with this Order, the Court, in addition to ordering production of the information, may: (1) specify the terms and conditions of such production; (2) grant a continuance; (3) impose evidentiary sanctions; (4) impose contempt or other sanctions on any lawyer responsible for violations of the Government’s disclosure obligations, or refer the matter to disciplinary authorities; (5) dismiss charges before trial or vacate a conviction after trial or a guilty plea; or (6) enter any other order that is just under the circumstances.

2 The Classified Information Procedures Act sets forth separate procedures to be followed in the event that the Government believes matters relating to classified information may arise in connection with the prosecution.