• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
6 results

Conner v. Parkwood Entertainment LLC

Docket 1:19-cv-00053, New York Southern District Court (Jan. 3, 2019)
Judge Edgardo Ramos, presiding
Civil Rights - Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, ECF
Cause28:1331 Fed. Question
Case Type446 Civil Rights - Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Tags446 Civil Rights, Americans With Disabilities Act, Other, 446 Civil Rights, Americans With Disabilities Act, Other
Plaintiff Mary Conner
Defendant Parkwood Entertainment LLC
cite Cite Docket

No. 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Marvin ...

Document Conner v. Parkwood Entertainment LLC, 1:19-cv-00053, No. 8 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2019)
Motion to Extend Time to Answer
Beijing Moscow Boston Munich Brussels New York Century City Orange County Chicago Paris Dubai Riyadh Düsseldorf Rome Frankfurt San Diego Hamburg San Francisco Hong Kong Seoul Houston Shanghai London Silicon Valley Los Angeles Singapore Madrid Tokyo Milan Washington, D.C.
Honorable Edgardo Ramos United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007-1312
Re: Conner v. Parkwood Entertainment, LLC, Case No. 1:19-cv-00053-ER Dear Judge Ramos: We represent Defendant Parkwood Entertainment, LLC (“Parkwood”) in this case and write on behalf of all parties.
Plaintiff and Parkwood have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, to extend Parkwood’s deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 28, 2019 in order to give Parkwood more time to assess the allegations and respond accordingly.
If the Court has any questions, please feel free to contact the parties.
cite Cite Document

No. 1 COMPLAINT against Parkwood Entertainment LLC

Document Conner v. Parkwood Entertainment LLC, 1:19-cv-00053, No. 1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2019)
Complaint
Due to lack of adequate labeling, Plaintiff and blind customers cannot make purchases or inquiries as to Defendant’s merchandise, nor can they enter their personal identification and financial information with confidence and security.
Because of Defendant’s denial of full and equal access to, and enjoyment of, the goods, benefits and services of Beyonce.com, Plaintiff and the class have suffered an injury- in-fact which is concrete and particularized and actual and is a direct result of Defendant’s conduct.
(c) Whether Defendant, through its website, Beyonce.com, denies the full and equal enjoyment of its goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations to people with visual disabilities in violation of the ADA; and
(d) Whether Defendant, through its website, Beyonce.com, denies the full and equal enjoyment of its goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations to people with visual disabilities in violation of the law of New York.
Title III of the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12182(a) provides that “No individual shall be discriminated against on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation by any person who owns, leases (or leases to), or operates a place of public accommodation.” Title III also prohibits an entity from “[u]tilizing standards or criteria or methods of administration that have the effect of discriminating on the basis of disability.” 42 U.S.C. § 12181(b)(2)(D)(I).
cite Cite Document

No. 14

Document Conner v. Parkwood Entertainment LLC, 1:19-cv-00053, No. 14 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2019)

cite Cite Document

No. 6

Document Conner v. Parkwood Entertainment LLC, 1:19-cv-00053, No. 6 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2019)

cite Cite Document

No. 2

Document Conner v. Parkwood Entertainment LLC, 1:19-cv-00053, No. 2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2019)

cite Cite Document