• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
309 results

Amazon.Com, Inc. v. Straight Path IP Group Inc

Docket 3:14-cv-04561, California Northern District Court (Oct. 13, 2014)
Hon. Edward J. Davila, presiding, Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins
Patent
DemandPlaintiff
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
6009469; 6108704; 6131121
6009469
61087046131121
Plaintiff Amazon.Com, Inc.
Defendant Straight Path IP Group Inc
cite Cite Docket

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 6,009,469

Docket IPR2015-01007, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Apr. 6, 2015)
Bart Gerstenblith, Kalyan Deshpande, Trenton Ward, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6009469
Petitioner Cisco Systems, Inc.
Patent Owner Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Assignee STRAIGHT PATH COMMUNICATIONS INC.
...
cite Cite Docket

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 6,009,469

Docket IPR2014-01367, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Aug. 22, 2014)
Bart Gerstenblith, Kalyan Deshpande, Trenton Ward, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6009469
Petitioner Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Patent Owner Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Assignee STRAIGHT PATH COMMUNICATIONS INC.
...
cite Cite Docket

Vonage Holdings Corporation, et al. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.

Docket IPR2014-01225, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Aug. 1, 2014)
Bart Gerstenblith, Kalyan Deshpande, Thomas Giannetti, Trenton Ward, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6009469
Petitioner Vonage Holdings Corporation, et al.
Patent Owner Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Assignee STRAIGHT PATH COMMUNICATIONS INC.
...
cite Cite Docket

Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc. v. ooVoo, LLC

Docket 2:12-cv-00008, Virginia Eastern District Court ()
District Judge Robert G. Doumar, presiding, Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller
Patent
DemandPlaintiff
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
6009469; 6513066; 6701365
6009469
65130666701365
Plaintiff Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
Defendant ooVoo, LLC
cite Cite Docket

Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc. v. Vivox, Inc.

Docket 2:12-cv-00007, Virginia Eastern District Court ()
District Judge Robert G. Doumar, presiding, Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard
Patent
DemandPlaintiff
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
6009469; 6108704; 6131121; 6513066; 6701365
6009469
6108704613112165130666701365
Plaintiff Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
Defendant Vivox, Inc.
Counter Defendant Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket

Sony Corporation v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.

Docket IPR2014-00231, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 5, 2013)
Bryan Moore, Miriam Quinn, Stacey White, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6009469
Petitioner Sony Corporation
Patent Owner Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Assignee STRAIGHT PATH COMMUNICATIONS INC.
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 44 REDACTED ORDER 14 Denying Motion to Dismiss; Granting 14 Motion to Transfer Venue

Document Amazon.Com, Inc. v. Straight Path IP Group Inc, 3:14-cv-04561, No. 44 (N.D.Cal. May. 28, 2015)
Presently before the Court is Defendant Straight Path IP Group, Inc.’s (“Straight Path” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff Amazon.com, Inc.’s (“Amazon” or “Plaintiff”) Complaint for Declaratory Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).
Straight Path has filed numerous suits, in various jurisdictions, against consumer electronic companies based on their sale of Internet-enabled devices (e.g., SmartTVs, Blu-ray players, tablets, or smartphones) with preinstalled video-streaming applications.
The parties to the Eastern District of Virginia actions agreed that a stay pending resolution of the inter partes reviews and Straight Path’s appeal would likely narrow the issues and conserve judicial resources.
Likewise, with respect to contributory infringement, the DataTern court found that the claim charts did not impliedly assert that Microsoft’s product was not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
Amazon argues that this targeting of LGE and VIZIO by Straight Path in their infringement suits is similar to those found to support subject matter jurisdiction in DataTern.
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>