- All Courts
- Federal Courts
- Bankruptcies
- PTAB
- ITC
Filters
Like full text docket searches?
Get docket alerts, perform legal research, get updates of major decisions and orders, use our advanced analytics, and more. Request a Demo or create your account.
Date Filed
Dollars
Find cases based on dollar amount with searches like:
$100k-$10M.
Read the details here.
Attorney
Court
Firm
Judge
Party
253 results
VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Hisense Co. Ltd. et al
Docket
2:24-cv-00904,
Texas Eastern District Court
(Nov. 6, 2024)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne
Patent
| Division | Marshall |
| Flags | JRG3, JURY, PATENT/TRADEMARK |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
| Case Type | 830 Patent |
| Tags | 830 Patent, 830 Patent |
| Patent | 7769238; 7970059; 8291236; 8605794; 8667304 776923879700598291236 86057948667304 |
| Deadline | Deadline to respond is extended until 04/02/2025. |
| Plaintiff | VideoLabs, Inc. |
| Plaintiff | VL Collective IP LLC |
| Defendant | Hisense Co. Ltd. |
| ... |
Cite Docket
Analyze
- Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
VideoLabs, Inc. v. HP Inc.
Docket
6:23-cv-00641,
Texas Western District Court
(Aug. 31, 2023)
Judge Derek T. Gilliland, presiding
Patent
| Division | Waco |
| Flags | PATENT |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
| Case Type | 830 Patent |
| Tags | 830 Patent, 830 Patent |
| Patent | 7430608; 7970059; 8291236 743060879700598291236 |
| Deadline | Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court ORDERS that the following amended schedule will govern deadlines up to and including the trial of this matter: Deadline March 20, 2025 April 17, 2025 May 15, 2025 June 5, 2025 June 12, 2025 Item Close of Fact Discovery. |
| Deadline | Dispositive/Daubert Motions due by 6/19/2025, Dispositive Motions due by 6/19/2025., Consent to Trial by Magistrate due by 6/19/2025., Motions due by 6/19/2025 |
| Plaintiff | VideoLabs, Inc. |
| Defendant | HP Inc. |
| Counter Plaintiff | HP Inc. |
| ... |
Cite Docket
Analyze
- Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Roku, Inc.
Docket
1:23-cv-01136,
Delaware District Court
(Oct. 11, 2023)
Judge Joel H Slomsky, presiding
Patent
| Division | Wilmington |
| Flags | STAYED, CLOSED, PATENT |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
| Case Type | 830 Patent |
| Tags | 830 Patent, 830 Patent |
| Patent | 7233790; 7440559; 7769238; 7970059; 8291236; 8605794; 8667304 72337907440559776923879700598291236 86057948667304 |
| Plaintiff | VideoLabs, Inc. |
| Plaintiff | VL Collective IP LLC |
| Defendant | Roku, Inc. |
| ... |
Cite Docket
Analyze
- Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
ASUSTek Computer Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.
Docket
IPR2025-00305,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(Dec. 17, 2024)
Brian Murphy, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, presiding
| Case Type | Inter Partes Review |
| Patent | 8291236 |
| Patent Owner | VideoLabs, Inc. |
| Petitioner | ASUSTek Computer Inc. |
Cite Docket
Analyze
- Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
ASUSTek Computer Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.
Docket
IPR2025-00304,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(Dec. 17, 2024)
Brian Murphy, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, presiding
| Case Type | Inter Partes Review |
| Patent | 8291236 |
| Patent Owner | VideoLabs, Inc. |
| Petitioner | ASUSTek Computer Inc. |
Cite Docket
Analyze
- Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
ASUSTek Computer Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.
Docket
IPR2025-00306,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(Dec. 17, 2024)
Brian Murphy, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, presiding
| Case Type | Inter Partes Review |
| Patent | 8291236 |
| Patent Owner | VideoLabs, Inc. |
| Petitioner | ASUSTek Computer Inc. |
Cite Docket
Analyze
- Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
Roku, Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.
Docket
IPR2024-01023,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(June 14, 2024)
Brian Murphy, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, presiding
| Case Type | Inter Partes Review |
| Patent | 8291236 |
| Deadline | DUE DATE 2: May 23, 2025 Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend |
| Deadline | DUE DATE 3: June 20, 2025 Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend (or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)5 |
| Patent Owner | VideoLabs, Inc. |
| Petitioner | Roku, Inc. |
Cite Docket
Analyze
- Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
Roku, Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.
Docket
IPR2024-01025,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(June 14, 2024)
Brian Murphy, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, presiding
| Case Type | Inter Partes Review |
| Patent | 8291236 |
| Deadline | DUE DATE 2: May 23, 2025 Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend |
| Deadline | DUE DATE 3: June 20, 2025 Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend (or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)5 |
| Patent Owner | VideoLabs, Inc. |
| Petitioner | Roku, Inc. |
Cite Docket
Analyze
- Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
