• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
11 results

PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Slack Technologies, Inc.

Docket 3:18-cv-05600, California Northern District Court (Sept. 12, 2018)
Judge Beth Labson Freeman, presiding
Patent
DivisionSan Francisco
FlagsADRMOP, AO279, CLOSED, RELATE
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
6928442; 7802310; 8099420
6928442
7802310
8099420
Plaintiff PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff Level 3 Communication, LLC
Defendant Slack Technologies, Inc.
cite Cite Docket

PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Slack Technologies, Inc.

Docket 5:18-cv-05600, California Northern District Court (Sept. 12, 2018)
Judge Beth Labson Freeman, presiding.
Patent

cite Cite Docket

No. 34 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR AMENDED JUDGMENT

Document Personal Web Technologies, LLC et al v. Match Group, LLC et al, 5:18-cv-03462, No. 34 (N.D.Cal. Jul. 20, 2021)
Motion for JudgmentDenied
The Court again DENIES the request by Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Twitch Interactive, Inc. for a new judgment.
As the Court explained in its previous order denying the request, ECF 699, Fed. R. Civ.
P. 58(d) does not provide for multiple judgments in a single case.
The Court has attached a proposed amended judgment to this Order.
The Court will file the amended judgment on July 26, 2021, absent objection from either party.
cite Cite Document

No. 19 **FILED IN ERROR, SEE 702 FOR CORRECTED ENTRY** ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR AMENDED JUDGMENT

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Slack Technologies, Inc., 5:18-cv-05600, No. 19 (N.D.Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)
Motion for JudgmentDenied
On March 13, 2019, the Court issued its order granting in part and denying in part Amazon’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that all infringement claims made against Amazon’s Simple Storage Service (“S3”) were barred by claim preclusion and the Kessler doctrine.
On February 3, 2020, the Court issued its order granting in part and denying in part Amazon.com, Inc.’s and Amazon Web Services, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement, and granting Twitch Interactive, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment of Northern District of California United States District Court noninfringement.
On March 2, 2021, the Court awarded Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Twitch Interactive, Inc. $4,615,242.28 in attorney fees and $203,300.10 in non-taxable costs.
On April 19, 2021, the Court granted an additional $571,961.71 in attorney fees and $11,120.97 in non-taxable costs in a separate order.
Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered in favor of, Amazon and against PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, in the amount of $5,403,122.68.
cite Cite Document

PersonalWeb Technologies LLC et al v. Rackspace US, Inc. et al

Docket 6:12-cv-00659, Texas Eastern District Court ()
Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding
Patent
09/19/2012
SUMMONS Issued as to Rackspace Hosting, Inc., Rackspace US, Inc. and emailed to pltf for service. (Attachments: # 1 Summons(es))(klb) (Entered: 09/19/2012)
09/17/2012
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Rackspace Hosting, Inc., Rackspace US, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0540-3785085.), filed by PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, Level 3 Communications, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 09/17/2012)
cite Cite Docket

No. 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST) against Slack Technologies, Inc

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Slack Technologies, Inc., 3:18-cv-05600, No. 11 (N.D.Cal. Oct. 4, 2018)
Complaint
Early operating systems facilitated this approach with standardized naming conventions, storage device identifiers, and folder structures.
Their approach assigned substantially unique identifiers to “data items” of any type: “the contents of a file, a portion of a file, a page in memory, an object in an object-oriented program, a digital message, a digital scanned image, a part of a video or audio signal, or any other entity which can be represented by a sequence of bits.” Applied system-wide, this invention would permit any data item to be stored, located, managed, synchronized, and accessed using its content-based identifier.
In contrast, a dynamic webpage is generated by a web server application, usually driven by server-side software, upon receipt of a request from a browser (user).
of the data file is present on at least one of said computers.” On information and belief, as set forth above, Defendant has caused its origin severs and the intermediate cache servers between an endpoint cache and one of its origin servers to, in response to receiving a conditional GET request with an If- None-Match header, determine whether it has a file present that matches the URI in the conditional
entitled to recover from Defendant the damages sustained by PersonalWeb as a result of Defendant’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial.
cite Cite Document

No. 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL; against Slack Technologies, Inc

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Slack Technologies, Inc., 3:18-cv-05600, No. 1 (N.D.Cal. Sep. 12, 2018)
Complaint
Early operating systems facilitated this approach with standardized naming conventions, storage device identifiers, and folder structures.
Their approach assigned substantially unique identifiers to “data items” of any type: “the contents of a file, a portion of a file, a page in memory, an object in an object-oriented program, a digital message, a digital scanned image, a part of a video or audio signal, or any other entity which can be represented by a sequence of bits.” Applied system-wide, this invention would permit any data item to be stored, located, managed, synchronized, and accessed using its content-based identifier.
Such HTML files typically include text, formatting, and references (hyperlinks) to other web contents, such as style sheets, scripts, and images.
On information and belief, if the downstream intermediate cache or the browser was later required to again serve or render the webpage, it went through the above process to determine which file content it still had authority
entitled to recover from Defendant the damages sustained by PersonalWeb as a result of Defendant’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial.
cite Cite Document

No. 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST) against Slack Technologies, Inc

Document PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. Slack Technologies, Inc., 5:18-cv-05600, No. 11 (N.D.Cal. Oct. 4, 2018)
Complaint
Early operating systems facilitated this approach with standardized naming conventions, storage device identifiers, and folder structures.
Their approach assigned substantially unique identifiers to “data items” of any type: “the contents of a file, a portion of a file, a page in memory, an object in an object-oriented program, a digital message, a digital scanned image, a part of a video or audio signal, or any other entity which can be represented by a sequence of bits.” Applied system-wide, this invention would permit any data item to be stored, located, managed, synchronized, and accessed using its content-based identifier.
In contrast, a dynamic webpage is generated by a web server application, usually driven by server-side software, upon receipt of a request from a browser (user).
of the data file is present on at least one of said computers.” On information and belief, as set forth above, Defendant has caused its origin severs and the intermediate cache servers between an endpoint cache and one of its origin servers to, in response to receiving a conditional GET request with an If- None-Match header, determine whether it has a file present that matches the URI in the conditional
entitled to recover from Defendant the damages sustained by PersonalWeb as a result of Defendant’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial.
cite Cite Document
1 2 >>