• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
5 results

Kinglite Holdings Inc v. Micro-Star International Co Ltd et al

Docket 2:15-cv-09612, California Central District Court (Dec. 14, 2015)
Judge James V. Selna, presiding, Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh
Patent
DivisionLos Angeles (Western Division)
DemandPlaintiff
Cause15:1126 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
5732268; 5836013; 5978912; 5987604; 6222562; 6263412; 6308265; 6401202; 6487656; 6502184; 6519659; 6633976; 6791572; 6892304; 7185189; 8095783
5732268583601359789125987604622256262634126308265640120264876566502184
6519659
66339766791572689230471851898095783
Plaintiff Kinglite Holdings Inc
Defendant Micro-Star International Co Ltd
Defendant MSI Computer Corp.
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-16939573 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Kinglite Holdings Inc

Document Kinglite Holdings Inc v. Micro-Star International Co Ltd et al, 2:15-cv-09612, No. 1 (C.D.Cal. Dec. 14, 2015)
Complaint
Defendants import, offer for sale, and/or sell MSI Z170A XPower Gaming Titanium Edition motherboards equipped with Intel Z170 chipset and loaded with American Megatrends, Inc. (“AMI”) UEFI T.ON BIOS (dated august 4, 2015) that practice the inventions of the patents in-suit (“Accused Products”).
The board of directors includes representatives from eleven “Promoter” companies: AMD, American Megatrends, Apple, Dell, HP, IBM, Insyde Software, Intel, Lenovo, Microsoft, and Phoenix Technologies.
Defendants’ importation, sale and/or offer to sell the Accused Products constitute direct infringement of claim 6 of the ‘268 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), insofar as the Accused Products have a first code portion in the UEFI BIOS loaded thereon to initiate POST and boot operations, and a second code portion to communicate with a separate computer in the event that there is a failure to complete boot operations.
Defendants’ importation, sale and/or offer to sell the Accused Products loaded with the AMI compatibility support module (“CSM”) constitute direct infringement of claims 11 and 20 of the ‘783 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) insofar as the CSM allows the processor to boot in Legacy or UEFI mode.
Users directly infringe claims 1 and 11 of the ‘604 Patent through operation of the Accused Products for which the paging feature in system management mode has been activated.
cite Cite Document

No. 48 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order Removing Action From Active Caseload by Judge James V. Selna: This ...

Document Kinglite Holdings Inc v. Micro-Star International Co Ltd et al, 2:15-cv-09612, No. 48 (C.D.Cal. Mar. 8, 2016)
Date March 8, 2016 Title Present: The Honorable James V. Selna Karla J. Tunis Deputy Clerk Not Present Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Defendants: Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present Not Present (In Chambers) ORDER REMOVING ACTION FROM ACTIVE CASELOAD Proceedings: This Court, having stayed the above action pending the outcome of related civil proceedings before this court, hereby removes the action from the active caseload to be reinstated upon application of the parties.
Initials of Preparer kjt :
cite Cite Document

No. 46 STIPULATION to Stay Case filed by Defendants MSI Computer Corp., Micro-Star International ...

Document Kinglite Holdings Inc v. Micro-Star International Co Ltd et al, 2:15-cv-09612, No. 46 (C.D.Cal. Mar. 4, 2016)
Case No. 2:15-cv-09612-JVS (PJWx) Case No. 2:15-cv-09615-JVS (PJWx) This stipulation is entered into by and among Plaintiff Kinglite Holdings, Inc. (“Kinglite”) and Defendants GIGA-BYTE Technology Co., Ltd., G.B.T., Inc. (collectively, “GIGA-BYTE Defendants”), Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. and MSI Computer Corp. (collectively, “Micro-Star Defendants”), parties to the above- titled consolidated action, by and through their respective counsel of record, pursuant to Central District Local Rule 7-1: WHEREAS, Kinglite filed a Complaint for patent infringement against the GIGA-BYTE Defendants on December 14, 2015, Kinglite Holdings, Inc. v. GIGA- BYTE Technology Co., Ltd. et al, Case No. 2:14-CV-09615-JVS (PJWx) (“the GIGA-BYTE Litigation”), Doc. 1, asserting 16 patents (the “Patents in Suit”); WHEREAS, Kinglite filed its Complaint for patent infringement against the Micro-Star Defendants in this action on December 14, 2015 (“Micro-Star Litigation”), Doc. 1, asserting the same 16 Patents in Suit; WHEREAS, on February 29, 2016, this Court ordered the GIGA-BYTE Litigation consolidated with this action for purposes of discovery and claim construction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a)(2) (GIGA-BYTE Litigation, Doc. 39); WHEREAS, the GIGA-BYTE Defendants and the Micro-Star Defendants must answer Kinglite’s Complaints in the consolidated case on or before March 21, 2016, and the Scheduling Conference in the consolidated case is set for April 4, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. (Doc. 40; GIGA-BYTE Litigation, Doc. 33); WHEREAS, the parties in this consolidated action are all parties to ongoing patent litigation pending before this Court, Kinglite Holdings, Inc. v. Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., et al, Case No. 14-cv-03009-JVS (PJWx), consolidated with Case No. 14-cv-04989-JVS (PJWx) (the “03009 Action”);
Case No. 2:15-cv-09612-JVS (PJWx) Case No. 2:15-cv-09615-JVS (PJWx) WHEREAS, Kinglite asserts a total of 25 Patents in the 03009 Action against the Micro-Star Defendants, GIGA-BYTE Defendants and American Megatrends, Inc. (“AMI”) (03009 Action, Docs.
40, 97); WHEREAS, the scope of accused products in the 03009 Action is substantially similar to the accused products in this action, such that the accused products in this action can be asserted in the 03009 Action; WHEREAS, the parties agree that there are overlapping issues of law and fact between this consolidated action and the 03009 Action, such that the 03009 Actionis likely to resolve at least some claims, issues and questions of law that are likely to be at issue in this action, including whether certain of the Patents in Suit are valid; WHEREAS, a stay of this action pending the resolution of the 03009 Action will promote efficiency, to the extent these claims, issues and questions of law may be resolved during the course of the 03009 Action; and WHEREAS, no party will be harmed by the issuance of a stay of this action, and instead a stay will allow the parties to avoid the expense and time associated with contemporaneous litigation; IT IS SO STIPULATED between all parties, by and through their undersigned attorneys, that upon approval of the Court, which approval the parties respectfully request:
Case No. 2:15-cv-09612-JVS (PJWx) Case No. 2:15-cv-09615-JVS (PJWx) (1) All further proceedings in this consolidated action, including the Defendants’ answer deadlines in this consolidated action, all scheduling requirements set forth in the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules for the Central District of California, discovery, pre-trial motions and trial, shall be stayed until further order of this Court, pending final resolution of Kinglite Holdings, Inc. v. Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., et al, Case No. 14-cv-03009- JVS (PJWx).
(3) Kinglite may include the products accused of infringement in these cases as part of its infringement contentions in Phase 2, as well as any subsequent phase of the 03009 Action.
cite Cite Document

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSFERRING AN APPLICATION PROGRAM FRO...

Docket 09/336,067, U.S. Patent Application (June 18, 1999)
Art Group2182
Case TypeUtility - 713/500000
Class713
Patent
6519659
CURTIS E. STEVENS
Assignee KINGLITE HOLDINGS INC.
Assignor PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
...
cite Cite Docket