• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
496 results

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 6,009,469

Docket IPR2015-01007, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (April 6, 2015)

cite Cite Docket

LG Electronics, Inc. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.

Docket IPR2015-01015, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Apr. 6, 2015)
Bart Gerstenblith, Kalyan Deshpande, Trenton Ward, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6009469
Petitioner LG Electronics, Inc.
Patent Owner Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Assignee STRAIGHT PATH COMMUNICATIONS INC.
...
cite Cite Docket

LG Electronics, Inc. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.

Docket IPR2015-00198, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Oct. 31, 2014)
Bart Gerstenblith, Kalyan Deshpande, Trenton Ward, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6009469
Petitioner LG Electronics, Inc.
Patent Owner Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Assignee STRAIGHT PATH COMMUNICATIONS INC.
...
cite Cite Docket

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 6,009,469

Docket IPR2014-01367, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Aug. 22, 2014)
Bart Gerstenblith, Kalyan Deshpande, Trenton Ward, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6009469
Petitioner Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Patent Owner Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Assignee STRAIGHT PATH COMMUNICATIONS INC.
...
cite Cite Docket

Vonage Holdings Corporation, et al. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.

Docket IPR2014-01225, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Aug. 1, 2014)

cite Cite Docket

Sony Corporation v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.

Docket IPR2014-00231, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 5, 2013)
Bryan Moore, Miriam Quinn, Stacey White, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6009469
Petitioner Sony Corporation
Patent Owner Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Assignee STRAIGHT PATH COMMUNICATIONS INC.
...
cite Cite Docket

14 Order: Order Reconsideration of Dependent Claim 10 of the Final Decision

Document IPR2015-01007, No. 14 Order - Order Reconsideration of Dependent Claim 10 of the Final Decision (P.T.A.B. Apr. 29, 2016)
After institution of inter partes review, Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) and AVAYA, Inc. (“AVAYA”) filed a Petition and Motion to Join the IPR2014-01367 proceeding.
We granted this motion and joined Samsung, Cisco, and AVAYA (collectively, “Petitioner”) to this inter partes review.
We also determined that these limitations are construed to mean “is connected to the computer network at the time the query is transmitted to the server.” Id. at 12.
Accordingly, we also determine that Microsoft Manual and NetBIOS fail to disclose the limitations of claim 10 for the same reasons discussed in our Final Decision.
We are not persuaded that Petitioner has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that claim 10 of the ʼ469 patent is unpatentable.
cite Cite Document

46 Order: Order Reconsideration of Dependent Claim 10 of the Final Decision

Document IPR2014-01367, No. 46 Order - Order Reconsideration of Dependent Claim 10 of the Final Decision (P.T.A.B. Apr. 29, 2016)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>