• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
120 results

NEODRON LTD., v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Docket 6:20-cv-00121, Texas Western District Court (Feb. 14, 2020)
Judge Alan D Albright, presiding
Patent
DivisionWaco
FlagsCLOSED, PATENT, STAYED
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
7821425; 7903092; 8749251; 9411472
7821425
790309287492519411472
Plaintiff NEODRON LTD.
Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
cite Cite Docket

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Neodron Ltd.

Docket IPR2020-01119, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (June 17, 2020)
Christopher Ogden, Miriam Quinn, Patrick Boucher, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7821425
Patent Owner Neodron Ltd.
Petitioner Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Petitioner Microsoft
...
cite Cite Docket

Apple Inc. v. Neodron Ltd.

Docket IPR2020-00778, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Apr. 16, 2020)
Christopher Ogden, Miriam Quinn, Patrick Boucher, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7821425
Patent Owner Neodron Ltd.
Petitioner Apple Inc.
Petitioner Samsung Electronics
...
cite Cite Docket

10 Termination Decision Document: Termination Decision Document

Document IPR2020-01119, No. 10 Termination Decision Document - Termination Decision Document (P.T.A.B. Feb. 19, 2021)
Petitioner and Patent Owner (collectively “the Parties”) have requested that the above-identified joined inter partes review proceeding be terminated pursuant to a settlement.
On February 1, 2021, we authorized the Parties, via email, to file a joint motion to terminate the joined proceeding.
The Parties also requested that the Settlement Agreements be treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the file of Patent 7,821,425.
We determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement Agreements as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is: ORDERED that the Joint Motion is granted, and that IPR2020-00778 is hereby terminated and IPR2020-01119 (the joined proceeding) is closed;
cite Cite Document

17 Termination Decision Document: Termination Decision Document

Document IPR2020-00778, No. 17 Termination Decision Document - Termination Decision Document (P.T.A.B. Feb. 19, 2021)
Petitioner and Patent Owner (collectively “the Parties”) have requested that the above-identified joined inter partes review proceeding be terminated pursuant to a settlement.
On February 1, 2021, we authorized the Parties, via email, to file a joint motion to terminate the joined proceeding.
The Parties also requested that the Settlement Agreements be treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the file of Patent 7,821,425.
We determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement Agreements as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is: ORDERED that the Joint Motion is granted, and that IPR2020-00778 is hereby terminated and IPR2020-01119 (the joined proceeding) is closed;
cite Cite Document

8 Institution Decision: Trial Instituted Document

Document IPR2020-01119, No. 8 Institution Decision - Trial Instituted Document (P.T.A.B. Nov. 23, 2020)

cite Cite Document

12 Order: DECISIONInstitution of Inter Partes Review and Grant of Motion for Joind...

Document IPR2020-00778, No. 12 Order - DECISIONInstitution of Inter Partes Review and Grant of Motion for Joinder35 USC ¿¿ 31437 CFR ¿¿ 42122b (P.T.A.B. Nov. 23, 2020)

cite Cite Document

11 Order: SCHEDULING ORDER

Document IPR2020-00778, No. 11 Order - SCHEDULING ORDER (P.T.A.B. Sep. 14, 2020)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 8 9 >>