• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
71 results

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 6,895,449

Docket IPR2017-00415, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 6, 2016)
Jennifer Bisk, Joni Chang, Miriam Quinn, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6895449
Petitioner Huawei Device Co., Ltd.
Patent Owner Papst Licensing GmbH & Co, KG
Petitioner Zte
...
cite Cite Docket

32 Termination Decision Document: Judgment Termination of Proceeding

Document IPR2017-00415, No. 32 Termination Decision Document - Judgment Termination of Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Jan. 18, 2018)
Petitioner, ZTE (USA) Inc. (“ZTE”), and Patent Owner, Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG (“Papst”), jointly move to terminate this inter partes review in light of their settlement that resolves their dispute regarding U.S. Patent No. 6,895,449 B2 (“the ’449 patent”).
The parties also filed a true copy of their written settlement agreement in connection with the termination as required by 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b).
Notably, 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), in part, provides the following (emphasis added): (a) IN GENERAL.—An inter partes review instituted under this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.
Although this inter partes review has been instituted, the proceeding is still in the briefing stage.
In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby: ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate is granted; FURTHER ORDERED that this review is terminated as to all parties including ZTE and Papst; and FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Request to File Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information and to keep such settlement agreement separate from the patent file, and to make it available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted.
cite Cite Document

29 Termination: Decision Granting Joint Motion to Terminate as to Petitioner Olymp...

Document IPR2017-00415, No. 29 Termination - Decision Granting Joint Motion to Terminate as to Petitioner Olympus Corporation and Olympus America, Inc (P.T.A.B. Jan. 4, 2018)

cite Cite Document

25 Order: Decision Granting Joint Motion to Terminate as to LG Electronics, Inc

Document IPR2017-00415, No. 25 Order - Decision Granting Joint Motion to Terminate as to LG Electronics, Inc (P.T.A.B. Nov. 30, 2017)

cite Cite Document

22 Order: Granting Petitioners Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice ofAndrew V Dev...

Document IPR2017-00415, No. 22 Order - Granting Petitioners Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice ofAndrew V Devkar37 CFR sec 4210 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 28, 2017)

cite Cite Document

17 Order: Order Conduct of the Proceeding 37 CFR 425

Document IPR2017-00415, No. 17 Order - Order Conduct of the Proceeding 37 CFR 425 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 6, 2017)

cite Cite Document

15 Order: Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2017 01617 and Grant of M...

Document IPR2017-00415, No. 15 Order - Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2017 01617 and Grant of Motion for Joinder (P.T.A.B. Oct. 17, 2017)

cite Cite Document

13 Order: Granting Joint Motion to Terminate as to Petitioner Huawei Device Co, Lt...

Document IPR2017-00415, No. 13 Order - Granting Joint Motion to Terminate as to Petitioner Huawei Device Co, Ltd37 CFR Sec 4274 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 23, 2017)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 6 >>