• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
120 results

NEODRON LTD., v. Microsoft Corporation

Docket 6:20-cv-00119, Texas Western District Court (Feb. 14, 2020)
Judge Alan D Albright, presiding
Patent
DivisionWaco
FlagsCLOSED, PATENT, STAYED
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
7821425; 7903092; 8749251
7821425
79030928749251
Plaintiff NEODRON LTD.
Defendant Microsoft Corporation
cite Cite Docket

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Neodron Ltd.

Docket IPR2020-01119, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (June 17, 2020)
Christopher Ogden, Miriam Quinn, Patrick Boucher, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7821425
Patent Owner Neodron Ltd.
Petitioner Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Petitioner Microsoft
...
cite Cite Docket

Apple Inc. v. Neodron Ltd.

Docket IPR2020-00778, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Apr. 16, 2020)
Christopher Ogden, Miriam Quinn, Patrick Boucher, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7821425
Patent Owner Neodron Ltd.
Petitioner Apple Inc.
Petitioner Samsung Electronics
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 15 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Document NEODRON LTD., v. Microsoft Corporation, 6:20-cv-00119, No. 15 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 11, 2021)
On this day, Plaintiff Neodron Ltd., (“Plaintiff”) and Microsoft Corporation (“Defendant”) announced to the Court that they have resolved Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendant asserted in this case.
Plaintiff and Defendant have therefore requested that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendant with prejudice, and with all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses taxed against the party incurring same.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same.
United States District Judge
cite Cite Document

10 Termination Decision Document: Termination Decision Document

Document IPR2020-01119, No. 10 Termination Decision Document - Termination Decision Document (P.T.A.B. Feb. 19, 2021)
Petitioner and Patent Owner (collectively “the Parties”) have requested that the above-identified joined inter partes review proceeding be terminated pursuant to a settlement.
On February 1, 2021, we authorized the Parties, via email, to file a joint motion to terminate the joined proceeding.
The Parties also requested that the Settlement Agreements be treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the file of Patent 7,821,425.
We determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement Agreements as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is: ORDERED that the Joint Motion is granted, and that IPR2020-00778 is hereby terminated and IPR2020-01119 (the joined proceeding) is closed;
cite Cite Document

17 Termination Decision Document: Termination Decision Document

Document IPR2020-00778, No. 17 Termination Decision Document - Termination Decision Document (P.T.A.B. Feb. 19, 2021)
Petitioner and Patent Owner (collectively “the Parties”) have requested that the above-identified joined inter partes review proceeding be terminated pursuant to a settlement.
On February 1, 2021, we authorized the Parties, via email, to file a joint motion to terminate the joined proceeding.
The Parties also requested that the Settlement Agreements be treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the file of Patent 7,821,425.
We determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement Agreements as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is: ORDERED that the Joint Motion is granted, and that IPR2020-00778 is hereby terminated and IPR2020-01119 (the joined proceeding) is closed;
cite Cite Document

8 Institution Decision: Trial Instituted Document

Document IPR2020-01119, No. 8 Institution Decision - Trial Instituted Document (P.T.A.B. Nov. 23, 2020)
For the reasons that follow, we institute inter partes review, and grant Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder.
As the moving party, Petitioner bears the burden of proving that it is entitled to the requested relief.
No changes in the schedule are anticipated or necessary, and the limited participation, if at all, of Petitioner will not impact the timeline of the ongoing trial.
FURTHER ORDERED that the case caption in IPR2020-00778, from now on, shall reflect joinder with this proceeding in accordance with the attached example.
Therefore the caption here has been updated to reflect that these Samsung entities are joined as Petitioner in this proceeding.
cite Cite Document

12 Order: DECISIONInstitution of Inter Partes Review and Grant of Motion for Joinder35 USC ¿¿ 31437 CFR ¿¿ 42122b

Document IPR2020-00778, No. 12 Order - DECISIONInstitution of Inter Partes Review and Grant of Motion for Joinder35 USC ¿¿ 31437 CFR ¿¿ 42122b (P.T.A.B. Nov. 23, 2020)
For the reasons that follow, we institute inter partes review, and grant Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder.
As the moving party, Petitioner bears the burden of proving that it is entitled to the requested relief.
No changes in the schedule are anticipated or necessary, and the limited participation, if at all, of Petitioner will not impact the timeline of the ongoing trial.
FURTHER ORDERED that the case caption in IPR2020-00778, from now on, shall reflect joinder with this proceeding in accordance with the attached example.
Therefore the caption here has been updated to reflect that these Samsung entities are joined as Petitioner in this proceeding.
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 8 9 >>