• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
261 results

VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Hisense Co. Ltd. et al

Docket 2:24-cv-00904, Texas Eastern District Court (Nov. 6, 2024)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne
Patent
DivisionMarshall
FlagsJRG3, JURY, PATENT/TRADEMARK
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
7769238; 7970059; 8291236; 8605794; 8667304
77692387970059
8291236
86057948667304
DeadlineDeadline to respond is extended until 04/02/2025.
Plaintiff VideoLabs, Inc.
Plaintiff VL Collective IP LLC
Defendant Hisense Co. Ltd.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

VIDEOLABS, INC. v. TCL Technology Group Corporation et al

Docket 2:25-cv-00161, Texas Eastern District Court (Feb. 10, 2025)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne
Patent
DivisionMarshall
FlagsJRG1, JURY, PATENT/TRADEMARK
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
7525535; 7769238; 7970059; 8139878; 8220027; 8291236; 8667304
75255357769238797005981398788220027
8291236
8667304
Plaintiff VIDEOLABS, INC.
Defendant TCL Technology Group Corporation
Defendant TCL Electronics Holdings, Ltd. (f/k/a TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings, Ltd.)
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Roku, Inc.

Docket 1:23-cv-01136, Delaware District Court (Oct. 11, 2023)
Judge Joel H Slomsky, presiding
Patent
DivisionWilmington
FlagsSTAYED, CLOSED, PATENT
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
7233790; 7440559; 7769238; 7970059; 8291236; 8605794; 8667304
7233790744055977692387970059
8291236
86057948667304
Plaintiff VideoLabs, Inc.
Plaintiff VL Collective IP LLC
Defendant Roku, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

ASUSTek Computer Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.

Docket IPR2025-00305, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 17, 2024)
Brian Murphy, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8291236
Patent Owner VideoLabs, Inc.
Petitioner ASUSTek Computer Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

ASUSTek Computer Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.

Docket IPR2025-00306, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 17, 2024)
Brian Murphy, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8291236
Patent Owner VideoLabs, Inc.
Petitioner ASUSTek Computer Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

ASUSTek Computer Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.

Docket IPR2025-00304, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 17, 2024)
Brian Murphy, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8291236
Patent Owner VideoLabs, Inc.
Petitioner ASUSTek Computer Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Roku, Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.

Docket IPR2024-01023, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (June 14, 2024)
Brian Murphy, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8291236
DeadlineDUE DATE 2: May 23, 2025 Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
DeadlineDUE DATE 3: June 20, 2025 Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend (or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)5
Patent Owner VideoLabs, Inc.
Petitioner Roku, Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Roku, Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.

Docket IPR2024-01025, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (June 14, 2024)
Brian Murphy, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8291236
DeadlineDUE DATE 2: May 23, 2025 Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
DeadlineDUE DATE 3: June 20, 2025 Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend (or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)5
Patent Owner VideoLabs, Inc.
Petitioner Roku, Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... 16 17 18 >>