• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
541 results

ZIRVI v. ILLUMINA, INC. et al

Docket 2:23-cv-01997, New Jersey District Court (Apr. 8, 2023)
Judge Madeline Cox Arleo, presiding, Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen
Patent
DivisionNewark
FlagsAPPEAL, CLOSED
Cause15:1126 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
... 7955794 ...
5002867500305950345065104791511486451302385132242514385351750825185243519430052022315216141523282952446365244813525447752987415302509531480953208145357590538602353875055399491540371154098185427930543572454459345455166547489554816295494810550398055081795514545552546455413115545522554553155545165571639557390755739095575849557883255958905602240561440256339725637684563960356440485656241566098856795245681702569089456959405705365571002957167855719028571902957337295744305579260757957145795716580099258043765834758584025658436695846710584671758467195849544585608358587325863708587421958769245888723588877958888195891636590048159225535935793594239159521745974164597679759940666013440601345660177386023540602560160278896040138605138060837636090558609649661106786124102618878362216036225060622991162516396291170630982263162296327410634641363554316372813639936564033206604902661048266186796620584677044168120056858394689074169138846931884703375470604317166431722673473614887455965745597175108417563576758242076118697612020767081077765317803537789962679018977914988
7955794
7960119800335480760638080380811036381506268150627820691782881038440407846086584812688486625849208585412078563246862895287416308795967888342488952688906626904579691632839279148928976693408349399795944126795355029537516
Plaintiff MONIB ZIRVI
Defendant ILLUMINA, INC.
Defendant AKIN GUMP STRAUSS ) HAUER & FELD LLP
...
cite Cite Docket

Ravgen, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. et al.

Docket 1:20-cv-01646, Delaware District Court (Dec. 3, 2020)
Judge Jennifer L. Hall, presiding
Patent
DivisionWilmington
FlagsCLOSED, MOTREF, PATENT
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
10131937; 10131947; 10131951; 10167508; 10233496; 10289800; 10308981; 10533223; 10718019; 10718024; 7332277; 7727720; 7955794; 8700338; 8712697; 8756020; 9206417; 9567639; 9624490; 9890421; 9994897
73322777727720
7955794
87003388712697875602092064179567639962449098904219994897
Plaintiff Ravgen, Inc.
Defendant Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.
Defendant Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 146 LETTER ORDER: In light of the foregoing, the 10/16/24 Telephone Status Conference is canceled

Document ZIRVI v. ILLUMINA, INC. et al, 2:23-cv-01997, No. 146 (D.N.J. Oct. 9, 2024)
United States District Court MLK Jr. Federal Bldg.
Courthouse 50 Walnut Street Newark, NJ 07102 Re: Zirvi v. Illumina, Inc., et al. Dear Judges Arleo and Alien: My firm, along with Sidley Austin, represents Defendant Illumina, Inc. in the above- captioned matter.
I am writing to advise the Court that, after Illumina filed its letter yesterday.
The parties are currently finalizing execution of the written settlement agreement, and Illumina therefore no longer requires the assistance of the Court.
Accord^agly, we withdraw our request for the Court to reopen this case to address settlement issuer We thank Your Honors for your attention to this matter.
cite Cite Document

No. 139 ORDER denying 120 Motion for Reconsideration as to the Akin Defendants and the case is CLOSED

Document ZIRVI v. ILLUMINA, INC. et al, 2:23-cv-01997, No. 139 (D.N.J. Aug. 6, 2024)
Motion for ReconsiderationDenied
Dear Litigants: Before this Court is Plaintiff Monib Zirvi’s (“Zirvi”) Motion for Reconsideration (the “Motion”) of the Court’s Order, ECF No. 119 (the “April Order”), dismissing his Complaint with prejudice.
Following an in-person settlement conference with the Honorable Jessica S. Allen, Zirvi has withdrawn his Motion as to Defendants Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rip Finst, Sean Boyle, Illumina, Inc., Latham & Watkins LLP, Roger Chin, and Douglas Lumish (the “Settling Defendants”).
His Motion, therefore, proceeds only as to Defendants Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP (“Akin”), Matthew A. Pearson (“Pearson”), and Angela Verrecchio (“Verrecchio”) (collectively, the “Akin Defendants”).
For the reasons stated below, Zirvi’s Motion is DENIED.1 To prevail on a motion for reconsideration, the movant must demonstrate “(1) an intervening change in the controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence that was not available when the court [issued its order]; or (3) the need to correct a clear error of law or fact or to prevent manifest injustice.” Max’s Seafood Café v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999).
As Plaintiff fails to state any new issues of fact and has not otherwise met the standard for reconsideration, his Motion must be denied.
cite Cite Document

No. 137 ORDER that Plaintiff Zirvi's pending motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 120) as to the Settling ...

Document ZIRVI v. ILLUMINA, INC. et al, 2:23-cv-01997, No. 137 (D.N.J. Aug. 1, 2024)
THIS MATTER having come before the Court for an in-person Settlement Conference on July 31, 2024; and Plaintiff Monib Zirvi and Defendants Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rip Finst, Sean Boyle, Illumina, Inc., Latham & Watkins LLP, Roger Chin, and Douglas Lumish (“Settling Defendants”) having reached a settlement; and the Court having placed the material terms of the settlement on the record; and for good cause shown; IT IS on this 31st day of July 2024,
Plaintiff Zirvi’s pending motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 120) as to the Settling Defendants only is hereby withdrawn.
The respective pending motions of Defendants Illumina, Inc. and Thermo Fisher and Rip Finst for sanctions (ECF Nos. 99 and 104) are hereby withdrawn and terminated.
cite Cite Document

No. 132 LETTER ORDER granting permission for attorney Charles Sanders to attend the in-person settlement ...

Document ZIRVI v. ILLUMINA, INC. et al, 2:23-cv-01997, No. 132 (D.N.J. Jul. 11, 2024)
United States District Court Martin Luther King Building & U.S.
v. Illumina, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-01997-MCA-JSA Dear Magistrate Judge Allen: This law firm represents Defendants Latham & Watkins LLP (“Latham”) and its attorneys Roger Chin and Douglas Lumish in the above-referenced matter.
I will represent these Defendants in person at the settlement conference along with Natalie Weiss, who is Assistant General Counsel at Latham.
We respectfully request permission for the attorney at Latham who has been principally responsible for handling this matter, Charles Sanders, to attend the settlement conference by telephone.
Mr. Sanders is based in Boston and will be in California during the week of the settlement conference for a hearing in federal court and client meetings.
cite Cite Document

No. 119

Document ZIRVI v. ILLUMINA, INC. et al, 2:23-cv-01997, No. 119 (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 355

Document Ravgen, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. et al., 1:20-cv-01646, No. 355 (D.Del. Apr. 22, 2024)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>