It has an impact plate 26 that, when it receives a load from a passenger in a rear- end collision, moves rearward and sort of pivots along that A axis and pushes the headrest, which is marked 22, upwards and forwards.
JUDGE WEATHERLY: I think it is implied, but I just want to make sure that I'm understanding, following this clearly, that actions taken in the '955 file history you believe sort of are appropriate for us to consider as being relevant to claims in all three patents?
So on DX- 29 -- JUDGE WEATHERLY: Help me understand how Dr. Viano could use computer software to model movement of a headrest and provide a graph of a trajectory and then essentially say, well, it doesn't really look like that and put some dotted lines on a paper as what it actually means?
MR. HALAN: It has the effect of reducing the forward velocity as any arcuate curve would result -- JUDGE WEATHERLY: Well, I prefer to use the term speed so that we can be clear about the scaler quantity versus a vector.
JUDGE WEATHERLY: So the purveyor of the software that enables the modeling, I guess they should be out of business, or is it because they are patent drawings here that makes them special and unreliable for that purpose, according to the Nystrom case that you are citing?