• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
9 results

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 8,585,136

Docket IPR2017-00462, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 10, 2016)
Mitchell Weatherly, Sally Medley, Thomas Giannetti, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8585136
Petitioner Doe, Jane
Patent Owner Doe, Pat
Assignee SAUDER MANUFACTURING CO.
cite Cite Docket

6 Termination Decision Document: Termination Decision Document

Document IPR2017-00462, No. 6 Termination Decision Document - Termination Decision Document (P.T.A.B. Dec. 10, 2016)
that “[e]ach noode typicallly comprisses a ... mmemory uniit 204” whiich may Cases IPR2012-00026 and IPR2013-00109 Patent 6,757,717 include “storage locations typically composed of random access memory (RAM) devices.” Id. at col. 5, ll. 40–47.
It is typically stored in memory as a data tree structure, but to enable clients and servers to communicate this information over HTTP, an index can be described using XML.
However, Microsoft has not presented evidence that the computers or routers described by Perlman necessarily use permanent storage memory Cases IPR2012-00026 and IPR2013-00109 Patent 6,757,717 as recited in claims 1 and 3.
Dr. Long testified that a skilled artisan would have considered Yohe and Perlman to be closely related technologies that are natural to combine because both references address the same problem and use the same algorithm in similar applications.
The ’717 Patent states: “The performance gains realized by the present invention are derived from the fact that computers in common wide-area networks tend to repetitively transmit the same data over the network.” Ex. 1002, col. 6, ll. 17–20.
cite Cite Document

7 Termination Decision Document: Termination Decision Document

Document IPR2017-00462, No. 7 Termination Decision Document - Termination Decision Document (P.T.A.B. Dec. 10, 2016)
that “[e]ach noode typicallly comprisses a ... mmemory uniit 204” whiich may Cases IPR2012-00026 and IPR2013-00109 Patent 6,757,717 include “storage locations typically composed of random access memory (RAM) devices.” Id. at col. 5, ll. 40–47.
It is typically stored in memory as a data tree structure, but to enable clients and servers to communicate this information over HTTP, an index can be described using XML.
However, Microsoft has not presented evidence that the computers or routers described by Perlman necessarily use permanent storage memory Cases IPR2012-00026 and IPR2013-00109 Patent 6,757,717 as recited in claims 1 and 3.
Dr. Long testified that a skilled artisan would have considered Yohe and Perlman to be closely related technologies that are natural to combine because both references address the same problem and use the same algorithm in similar applications.
The ’717 Patent states: “The performance gains realized by the present invention are derived from the fact that computers in common wide-area networks tend to repetitively transmit the same data over the network.” Ex. 1002, col. 6, ll. 17–20.
cite Cite Document

3 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition: Notice of Accord Filing Date

Document IPR2017-00462, No. 3 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition - Notice of Accord Filing Date (P.T.A.B. Dec. 10, 2016)
The petition for inter partes review in the above proceeding has been accorded the filing date of September 18, 2012.
Patent Owner may file a preliminary response to the petition no later than three months from the date of this notice.
For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://ww.uspto.gov/PTAB.
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document

1 Petition: test petition 20161210

Document IPR2017-00462, No. 1 Petition - test petition 20161210 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 10, 2016)
Prior Art: Each of Perlman (e.g., the receiver requests database contents (e.g., CSNP) or fragment thereof), Yohe (e.g., Fig. 15, step 724), and Santos (e.g., Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717 Page 26
In the absence of such a specific description, we assume that anyone desiring to carry out such computerized warehousing and inventory control systems would know of the equipment and techniques to be used.”) B. Obviousness: Arguable Differences From Some Claims Perlman: Perlman’s illustrative embodiment is a general-purpose computer running a link state router protocol requiring rapid propagation of routing table updates, and thus naturally stores its digital fingerprints in RAM, not in the receiver’s permanent memory (cf.
For example, read/write speed is paramount in the routing table synchronization application of Perlman’s illustrative embodiment, not storage capacity, and routers typically are rebooted only rarely, so its cache naturally was in volatile RAM.
On the other hand, Yohe’s illustrative application of synchronizing entire file systems (on client computers that might be rebooted frequently), recommended the greater storage capacity and persistence of storing the cache on disk not solely in RAM.
FILED VIA PRPS ON: September 18, 2012 Certificate of Service in Compliance With 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4) The undersigned certifies that a complete copy of this Petition for Inter Partes Review was served on the official correspondence address for the ’717 Patent shown in PAIR and the attorneys of record for Plaintiff in the concurrent litigation matter:
cite Cite Document

8 Notice of Appeal: Notice of appeal

Document IPR2017-00462, No. 8 Notice of Appeal - Notice of appeal (P.T.A.B. Dec. 10, 2016)
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office c/o Office of the General Counsel Madison Building East, 10B20 600 Dulaney Street Alexandria, VA 22314-5793 Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a), that Patent Owner Proxyconn Inc. (“Proxyconn”) hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Final Written Decision entered on February 19, 2014 (Paper 73) (the “Final Written Decision”), and from all underlying orders, decisions, rulings and opinions, including without limitation the Decision to Initiate Trial for Inter Partes Review entered on December 21, 2012 (Paper 17).
In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a)(3)(ii), Patent Owner Proxyconn further indicates that the issues on appeal include, but are not limited to, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's application and use of the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, claim construction, institution of Inter Partes review, denial of Proxyconn’s discovery into secondary considerations, determination of unpatentability of claims, 6, 10, 11, and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717 (the “‘717 Patent”), under 35 U.S.C. § 102, determination of unpatentability of claim 10 of the ‘717 patent under 35 U.S.C. §103, denial of Proxyconn’s motion to amend the claims of the ‘717 Patent including proposed claims 35-36, and any finding or Case No.: IPR2012-00026 & IPR2013-00109 Patent 6,757,717 B1 Attorney’s Docket No.: 16502-400002 determination supporting or related to those issues, as well as all other issues decided adversely to Patent Owner Proxyconn in any orders, decisions, rulings and opinions.
Simultaneous with this submission, a copy of this Notice of Appeal is being filed with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
In addition, this Notice of Appeal, along with the required docketing fees, is being filed with the Clerk’s Office for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Dated: April 23, 2014 Respectfully Submitted by: /Matthew L. Cutler / MATTHEW L. CUTLER, Reg. No., 43574 BRYAN K. WHEELOCK, Reg. No., 31441 DOUGLAS ROBINSON, Reg. No., 59703 GREG W. MEYER, Reg. No., 59915
cite Cite Document

4 Power of Attorney: PO POA 20161210

Document IPR2017-00462, No. 4 Power of Attorney - PO POA 20161210 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 10, 2016)
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. no persons are requéred to respond to e coilectéon of information unless it displays a valid OMB controt number.
Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form andlor suggestions for reducing this burden, shotzid be sent to the Chief lnfomiattorz Otfioer.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under th _g_;_ Reductct cf1995,no _-_-=__ ruired to resend to a collection or information unless itciisia s a valid OMB control number.
the assignee of an undivided interest in the entirety of {a compieie assignment from one of the joint inventors was made} the patent applicationlpatent identified above.
A chain of titie from the inventorls), of the patent applicaiioriipatent identified above, to the current aeslgnee as follows: 1, mm; Leonid Goldsteln 1-0; Proxycono.
cite Cite Document

2 Power of Attorney: POA test 20161210

Document IPR2017-00462, No. 2 Power of Attorney - POA test 20161210 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 10, 2016)
Trial Number: To be assigned In re Inter Partes Review of: U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717 Issued: June 29, 2004 Applicant: Leonid Goldstein Application No. 09/398,007 Filed: September 16, 1999 Title: System And Method For Data Access Currently in Litigation Styled: Proxyconn Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., Central District of California, Case No. SA CV11- 1681 DOC (ANx) [Consolidated With Case Nos. SA CV11-1682 DOC (ANx), SA CV11-1683 DOC (ANx), and SA CV11-1684 DOC (ANx)] ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Petitioner Microsoft Corporation hereby appoints the Practitioners associated with Customer Number 26119 as its attorneys, and to transact all business in the Patent Trial & Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office connected with the above-captioned petition for Inter Partes Review.
Address all e-mails and telephone calls to Microsoft’s lead and back-up counsel (each associated with the above Customer Number):
FILED VIA PRPS ON: September 18, 2012 Certificate of Service in Compliance With 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4) The undersigned certifies that a complete copy of this Appendix and List of Exhibits to Petition for Inter Partes Review and Exhibits 1001-1018 were served on the official correspondence address for the ’717 Patent shown in PAIR and the attorneys of record for Plaintiff in the concurrent litigation matter:
By /John D. Vandenberg/ John D. Vandenberg Registration No. 31312 One World Trade Center, Suite 1600 121 S.W.
cite Cite Document
1 2 >>