• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
42 results

Google LLC v. Gesture Technology Partners, LLC

Docket IPR2022-00359, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Jan. 6, 2022)
Brent Dougal, Joni Chang, Kevin Turner, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7933431
Patent Owner Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Petitioner Google LLC
Petitioner LG Electronics
cite Cite Docket

8 Final Written Decision original: Final Written Decision original

Document IPR2022-00359, No. 8 Final Written Decision original - Final Written Decision original (P.T.A.B. Nov. 30, 2022)
If the specification “reveal[s] a special definition given to a claim term by the patentee that differs from the meaning it would otherwise possess[,] ... the inventor’s lexicography governs.” Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc) (citing CCS Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corp., 288 F.3d 1359, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2002)).
Patent Owner argues that “Numazaki requires two photo-detection units to perform an analysis of a target object and control the computer, so it does not teach or suggest ‘determining’ finger movement from reflected light that is ‘electro-optically’ sensed using one ‘sensor means,’ as set forth in [the] claim.” PO Resp. 13.
For the above reasons, Patent Owner’s arguments do not undermine the showing by Petitioner that Numazaki in view of the knowledge of a PHOSITA teaches all of the aspects of the determining movement claim element.
For the above reasons, Patent Owner’s arguments do not undermine the showing by Petitioner that Numazaki in view of the knowledge of a PHOSITA teaches all of the aspects of the computer means claim element.
Petitioner argues that Numazaki’s fifth embodiment teaches a “conference record system” or TV telephone and that “a PHOSITA would have been motivated to implement this transmission functionality in the portable device described in Numazaki’s eighth embodiment.” Pet. at 32–33 (citing Ex. 1003, 38:6–16, 40:16–49; Ex. 1008 ¶¶ 50–52, 58): id. at 33–34.
cite Cite Document

7 Institution Decision Joined: Institution Decision Joined

Document IPR2022-00359, No. 7 Institution Decision Joined - Institution Decision Joined (P.T.A.B. May. 6, 2022)

cite Cite Document

4 Notice Notice filing date accorded: Notice Notice filing date accorded

Document IPR2022-00359, No. 4 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice Notice filing date accorded (P.T.A.B. Jan. 12, 2022)

cite Cite Document

1 Petition: Petition for Inter Partes Review of US Patent No 7,933,431

Document IPR2022-00359, No. 1 Petition - Petition for Inter Partes Review of US Patent No 7,933,431 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 6, 2022)

cite Cite Document

5 Mandatory Notice: PATENT OWNER���S MANDATORY NOTICES UNDER 37 CFR...

Document IPR2022-00359, No. 5 Mandatory Notice - PATENT OWNER���S MANDATORY NOTICES UNDER 37 CFR �� 428 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 18, 2022)

cite Cite Document

6 Power of Attorney: GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC���S POWER OF A...

Document IPR2022-00359, No. 6 Power of Attorney - GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC���S POWER OF ATTORNEY (P.T.A.B. Jan. 18, 2022)

cite Cite Document

2 Power of Attorney: Petitioner Google LLCs Power of Attorney and Designation of...

Document IPR2022-00359, No. 2 Power of Attorney - Petitioner Google LLCs Power of Attorney and Designation of Lead and Backup Counsel (P.T.A.B. Jan. 6, 2022)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 >>