• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 2,186 results

No. 589 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 589 (D.Del. Oct. 7, 2022)
Jack B. Blumenfeld, Cameron P. Clark, MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELLLLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Tomasulo (argued), David P. Enzminger, Gino Cheng,JoeS.
With the Take-Two Case’s appeal resolved, Defendant now moves for summary judgment of noninfringement, arguing that Plaintiff is collaterally estopped from relitigating infringementissues it lost in the Take-Two Case.
Plaintiff argued that GTAO infringes the m-regular limitation because the players’ avatars “share more data when they are near each other” thus causing an m-regular network to “arise naturally as the players are moving throughout the game.” Take-Two SJ Opinion at *8 (cleaned up).
Player Movement Issue Defendant argues that, just as with GTAO in the Take-Two Case, Plaintiff's infringement arguments rely on a “claim that the [Defendant’s] networks may or may not be m-regular depending on the players’ actions in the game.” (D.I.
This reasoning was underscored by the fact that “for the °344, ’966, and ’147 patents ... the patentee added the m-regularlimitation during prosecution” to overcome “a specific prior art reference[,]” thus barring Plaintiff “by prosecution history estoppel from now attempting to erase that limitation from the patents.” (/d.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 284

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 284 (D.Del. Sep. 27, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 233

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 233 (D.Del. Sep. 19, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 188

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 188 (D.Del. Aug. 23, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 183

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 183 (D.Del. Jul. 24, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 178

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 178 (D.Del. Jul. 11, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 176

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 176 (D.Del. Jul. 11, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 167

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 167 (D.Del. Jun. 26, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 164

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 164 (D.Del. Jun. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 155

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 155 (D.Del. Jun. 7, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 153

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 153 (D.Del. Jun. 7, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 156

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 156 (D.Del. Jun. 7, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc.

Docket 1:15-cv-00228, Delaware District Court (March 11, 2015)
Judge Richard G. Andrews, presiding.
Patent

cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 533

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 533 (D.Del. Jul. 15, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 845

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 845 (D.Del. Apr. 28, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>