• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
328 results

GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC v. LG ELECTRONICS INC. ET AL.

Docket 2:21-cv-19234, New Jersey District Court (Oct. 22, 2021)
Judge Stanley R. Chesler, presiding, Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer
Patent
DivisionNewark
FlagsSCHEDO, STAYED
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
7804530; 7933431; 8194924; 8553079; 8878949
7804530
7933431
819492485530798878949
Plaintiff GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant LG ELECTRONIC INC.
Defendant LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
...
cite Cite Docket

Google LLC v. Gesture Technology Partners, LLC

Docket IPR2022-00359, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Jan. 6, 2022)
Brent Dougal, Joni Chang, Kevin Turner, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7933431
Patent Owner Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Petitioner Google LLC
Petitioner LG Electronics
cite Cite Docket

LG Electronics, Inc. v. Gesture Technology Partners, LLC

Docket IPR2022-00091, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Nov. 5, 2021)
Brent Dougal, Joni Chang, Kevin Turner, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7933431
Patent Owner Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Petitioner LG Electronics, Inc.
Petitioner Google
cite Cite Docket

Apple Inc. v. Gesture Technology Partners, LLC

Docket IPR2021-00920, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (May 21, 2021)
Brent Dougal, Joni Chang, Kevin Turner, Kristi Sawert, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7933431
Patent Owner Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Petitioner Apple Inc.
Petitioner Google
...
cite Cite Docket

Unified Patents, LLC v. Gesture Technology Partners, LLC

Docket IPR2021-00917, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (May 14, 2021)
Brent Dougal, Joni Chang, Kevin Turner, Kristi Sawert, Scott Raevsky, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7933431
Patent Owner Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Petitioner Unified Patents, LLC
cite Cite Docket

No. 148 OPINION and ORDER denying 100 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

Document GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC v. LG ELECTRONICS INC. ET AL., 2:21-cv-19234, No. 148 (D.N.J. Dec. 23, 2024)
Motion for Judgment on the PleadingsDenied
LG offers this summary of its argument, quoted here in its entirety, at step one: Claim 4 is not “inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus,” and the patent itself acknowledges that taking photographs in response to observable cues-such as a subject posing-has long been practiced in the human mind.
• FIG. 3 illustrates a self timer like mode, or when specific dates or other circumstances exist, including a system embodiment for taking pictures in shopping malls or other locales and providing instant print or other hardcopy capability (e.g. on a tee shirt).
Case 2:21-cv-19234-SRC-MAH Document 148 Filed 12/23/24 Page 7 of 16 PageID: 3060 These specification statements support the inference that an important aspect of the functioning of the invention is the capacity to enable photography subjects themselves to issue gestural commands to a device in order to have a photograph taken.
LG has failed to persuade that the method that can be inferred from claim 4 (which includes gestural image capture commands) is nothing more than the long prevalent fundamental practice of photography in response to observable cues.
Pursuant to Astellas and Berkheimer, this specification statement in a valid patent is sufficient to raise a factual dispute over whether Case 2:21-cv-19234-SRC-MAH Document 148 Filed 12/23/24 Page 16 of 16 PageID: 3069 the combination of elements in claim 4 is well-understood, routine and conventional to a skilled artisan in the relevant field.
cite Cite Document

No. 144

Document GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC v. LG ELECTRONICS INC. ET AL., 2:21-cv-19234, No. 144 (D.N.J. Nov. 13, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 124

Document GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC v. LG ELECTRONICS INC. ET AL., 2:21-cv-19234, No. 124 (D.N.J. Aug. 2, 2024)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>