• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 54-68 of 1,736 results

No. 485

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 485 (D.Del. Sep. 26, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 728 Joint Status Report, by Acceleration Bay LLC

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 728 (D.Del. Nov. 1, 2021)
On April 21, 2020, the Court sua sponte stayed these actions pending the resolution of the appeal from related case Acceleration Bay LLC, v. 2K Sports, Inc., 1:16-cv-00455 (the “Take Two Action”).
1 See also Phil-Insul Corp. v. Airlite Plastics Co., 854 F.3d 1344, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (explaining collateral estoppel applies on infringement “where the differences between” two products are “unrelated to the limitations in the claim of the patent”); Studiengesellschaft Kohle, mbH v. USX Corp., 675 F. Supp.
As to the ‘344 and ‘966 patents, the only remaining claim is Acceleration Bay’s argument that the Plants vs. Zombies (PvZ) and NHL games supposedly infringe through internal testing.
As to the ‘497 patent, although the Court declined to grant summary judgment on the issue of internal testing, it negated the significance of that ruling when it rejected Acceleration Bay’s sole, substantive infringement theory.
Notably, Acceleration Bay did not appeal this Court’s decision that neither of the accused networks meets the m-regular limitations, either literally or by equivalents, because each participant player connects to a server, which cannot be m-regular.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 692

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 692 (D.Del. Sep. 4, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 693

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 693 (D.Del. Sep. 4, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 53

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 5:19-cv-04133, No. 53 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 17, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 460

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 460 (D.Del. Feb. 28, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 646

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 646 (D.Del. Mar. 5, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 455

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 455 (D.Del. Jan. 18, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 456

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 456 (D.Del. Jan. 18, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 5:19-cv-04133, No. 1 (N.D.Cal. Jul. 18, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 448

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 448 (D.Del. Dec. 10, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 630

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 630 (D.Del. Nov. 28, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 620

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 620 (D.Del. Oct. 30, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 619

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 619 (D.Del. Oct. 30, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 604

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 604 (D.Del. Oct. 23, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>